| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 252 |
| Number of pages | 269 |
| Journal | Child and Family Law Quarterly |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Cite this
Balmer, N. J., Smith, M., Miles, J., Denvir, C., & Patel, A. (2013). In Scope but out of Reach? Examining differences between publicly -funded telephone and face-to-face family law advice, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 25(3), 252.
@article{b327ffe10110490188238cbeb202c973,
title = "In Scope but out of Reach? Examining differences between publicly -funded telephone and face-to-face family law advice,",
author = "Balmer, {Nigel J.} and Marisol Smith and Jo Miles and Catrina Denvir and Ash Patel",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "252",
journal = "Child and Family Law Quarterly",
issn = "1358-8184",
publisher = "Jordan Publishing",
number = "3",
}
Balmer, NJ, Smith, M, Miles, J, Denvir, C & Patel, A 2013, 'In Scope but out of Reach? Examining differences between publicly -funded telephone and face-to-face family law advice,', Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 252.
In Scope but out of Reach? Examining differences between publicly -funded telephone and face-to-face family law advice, / Balmer, Nigel J.; Smith, Marisol; Miles, Jo; Denvir, Catrina; Patel, Ash.
In: Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2013, p. 252.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - In Scope but out of Reach? Examining differences between publicly -funded telephone and face-to-face family law advice,
AU - Balmer, Nigel J.
AU - Smith, Marisol
AU - Miles, Jo
AU - Denvir, Catrina
AU - Patel, Ash
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
M3 - Article
VL - 25
SP - 252
JO - Child and Family Law Quarterly
JF - Child and Family Law Quarterly
SN - 1358-8184
IS - 3
ER -
Balmer NJ, Smith M, Miles J, Denvir C, Patel A. In Scope but out of Reach? Examining differences between publicly -funded telephone and face-to-face family law advice, Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2013;25(3):252.