In Reply: Clinical quality registries for clinician-level reporting: strengths and limitations

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-323e.1
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume208
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2018

Cite this

@article{c45368f2ae274f268f7e95fd9a345830,
title = "In Reply: Clinical quality registries for clinician-level reporting: strengths and limitations",
author = "Susannah Ahern and Evans, {Susan M.} and Ingrid Hopper and Arul Earnest",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "16",
doi = "10.5694/mja17.00644",
language = "English",
volume = "208",
pages = "323--323e.1",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AMPCo",
number = "7",

}

In Reply : Clinical quality registries for clinician-level reporting: strengths and limitations. / Ahern, Susannah; Evans, Susan M.; Hopper, Ingrid; Earnest, Arul.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 208, No. 7, 16.04.2018, p. 323-323e.1.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - In Reply

T2 - Clinical quality registries for clinician-level reporting: strengths and limitations

AU - Ahern, Susannah

AU - Evans, Susan M.

AU - Hopper, Ingrid

AU - Earnest, Arul

PY - 2018/4/16

Y1 - 2018/4/16

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046250375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5694/mja17.00644

DO - 10.5694/mja17.00644

M3 - Letter

VL - 208

SP - 323-323e.1

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 7

ER -