In clinical practice, the term "central sensitivity score" is more useful than the term "polysymptomatic distress scale"

Comment on the Editorial by Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2553
Number of pages1
JournalArthritis and Rheumatology
Volume67
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2015

Cite this

@article{2de875de838d4041a870ea0e96f56779,
title = "In clinical practice, the term {"}central sensitivity score{"} is more useful than the term {"}polysymptomatic distress scale{"}: Comment on the Editorial by Wolfe",
author = "Littlejohn, {Geoffrey O.} and Guymer, {Emma K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/art.39213",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "2553",
journal = "Arthritis and Rheumatology",
issn = "2326-5191",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In clinical practice, the term "central sensitivity score" is more useful than the term "polysymptomatic distress scale"

T2 - Comment on the Editorial by Wolfe

AU - Littlejohn, Geoffrey O.

AU - Guymer, Emma K.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940118095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/art.39213

DO - 10.1002/art.39213

M3 - Letter

VL - 67

SP - 2553

JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology

JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology

SN - 2326-5191

IS - 9

ER -