Improving the safety of breast implants

implant-associated lymphoma

Research output: Contribution to journalComment / DebateOtherpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A likely causal link between breast implants and lymphoma highlights the importance of a prospective registry

Breast devices, including implants and tissue expanders, are classified as class III (high risk) medical devices by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, and are subject to the highest level of regulatory control. They have been associated with highly publicised health scares in the past, particularly, the Poly Implant Prothèse crisis.1 More recently, breast implants have again created national concern, with the Therapeutic Goods Administration confirming in late 2016 that there were 46 reports of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in Australia, including three cases that resulted in death. This number has since increased to 53.2 Most breast implants are used in young women and in women who have had breast cancer, thus long term exposure to these devices can be anticipated. It is therefore imperative to identify serious adverse effects at the earliest opportunity. The Australian Breast Device Registry is ideally positioned to do this, but it requires sufficient resources and engagement to ensure that it remains fit for purpose.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-186.e1
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume207
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Cite this

@article{2a9f1f8c3fb3475f937a6d6867d0f26e,
title = "Improving the safety of breast implants: implant-associated lymphoma",
abstract = "A likely causal link between breast implants and lymphoma highlights the importance of a prospective registryBreast devices, including implants and tissue expanders, are classified as class III (high risk) medical devices by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, and are subject to the highest level of regulatory control. They have been associated with highly publicised health scares in the past, particularly, the Poly Implant Proth{\`e}se crisis.1 More recently, breast implants have again created national concern, with the Therapeutic Goods Administration confirming in late 2016 that there were 46 reports of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in Australia, including three cases that resulted in death. This number has since increased to 53.2 Most breast implants are used in young women and in women who have had breast cancer, thus long term exposure to these devices can be anticipated. It is therefore imperative to identify serious adverse effects at the earliest opportunity. The Australian Breast Device Registry is ideally positioned to do this, but it requires sufficient resources and engagement to ensure that it remains fit for purpose.",
author = "Ingrid Hopper and Susannah Ahern and McNeil, {John J} and Deva, {Anand K} and Elilsabeth Elder and Colin Moore and Rodney Cooter",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.5694/mja17.00005",
language = "English",
volume = "207",
pages = "185--186.e1",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AMPCo",
number = "5",

}

Improving the safety of breast implants : implant-associated lymphoma. / Hopper, Ingrid; Ahern, Susannah; McNeil, John J; Deva, Anand K; Elder, Elilsabeth; Moore, Colin; Cooter, Rodney.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 207, No. 5, 08.2017, p. 185-186.e1.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment / DebateOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the safety of breast implants

T2 - implant-associated lymphoma

AU - Hopper, Ingrid

AU - Ahern, Susannah

AU - McNeil, John J

AU - Deva, Anand K

AU - Elder, Elilsabeth

AU - Moore, Colin

AU - Cooter, Rodney

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - A likely causal link between breast implants and lymphoma highlights the importance of a prospective registryBreast devices, including implants and tissue expanders, are classified as class III (high risk) medical devices by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, and are subject to the highest level of regulatory control. They have been associated with highly publicised health scares in the past, particularly, the Poly Implant Prothèse crisis.1 More recently, breast implants have again created national concern, with the Therapeutic Goods Administration confirming in late 2016 that there were 46 reports of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in Australia, including three cases that resulted in death. This number has since increased to 53.2 Most breast implants are used in young women and in women who have had breast cancer, thus long term exposure to these devices can be anticipated. It is therefore imperative to identify serious adverse effects at the earliest opportunity. The Australian Breast Device Registry is ideally positioned to do this, but it requires sufficient resources and engagement to ensure that it remains fit for purpose.

AB - A likely causal link between breast implants and lymphoma highlights the importance of a prospective registryBreast devices, including implants and tissue expanders, are classified as class III (high risk) medical devices by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, and are subject to the highest level of regulatory control. They have been associated with highly publicised health scares in the past, particularly, the Poly Implant Prothèse crisis.1 More recently, breast implants have again created national concern, with the Therapeutic Goods Administration confirming in late 2016 that there were 46 reports of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in Australia, including three cases that resulted in death. This number has since increased to 53.2 Most breast implants are used in young women and in women who have had breast cancer, thus long term exposure to these devices can be anticipated. It is therefore imperative to identify serious adverse effects at the earliest opportunity. The Australian Breast Device Registry is ideally positioned to do this, but it requires sufficient resources and engagement to ensure that it remains fit for purpose.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032378773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5694/mja17.00005

DO - 10.5694/mja17.00005

M3 - Comment / Debate

VL - 207

SP - 185-186.e1

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 5

ER -