TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving the accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices in Australia
T2 - a modelled return on investment study
AU - Desson, Zachary
AU - Sharman, James E.
AU - Searles, Andrew
AU - Schutte, Aletta E.
AU - Delles, Christian
AU - Olsen, Michael Hecht
AU - Ordunez, Pedro
AU - Hure, Alexis
AU - Morton, Rachael
AU - Figtree, Gemma
AU - Webster, Jacqui
AU - Jennings, Garry
AU - Redfern, Julie
AU - Nicholls, Stephen J.
AU - McNamara, Martin
AU - Deeming, Simon
AU - Doyle, Kerry
AU - Ramanathan, Shanthi
N1 - Funding Information:
The work described in this paper was part of a Synergy Seed Grant provided by the NSW Office for Health and Medical Research. Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Funding Information:
We acknowledge the funding provided by the New South Wales Office for Health and Medical Research to undertake the application of FAIT to a selection of cardiovascular research projects, of which VALID BP was one. We also thank Rod Ling and Shefi D’Silva for guidance with the economic costing and the decision tree used in the analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - The VALID BP project was initiated to increase the availability of validated blood pressure measuring devices (BPMDs). The goal is to eliminate non validated BPMDs and minimise over- and underdiagnosis of hypertension caused by inaccurate readings. This study was undertaken to assess the potential return on investment in the VALID BP project. The Framework to Assess the Impact of Translational Health Research was applied to the VALID BP project. This paper focuses on the implementation of the cost benefit analysis aspect of this framework to monetise past research investment and model future research costs, implementation costs, and benefits. Analysis was based on reasoned assumptions about potential impacts from availability and use of validated BPMDs (assuming an end goal of 100% validated BPMDs available in Australia by 2028) and improved skills leading to more accurate BP measurement. After 5 years, with 20% attribution of benefits, there is a potential $1.14–$1.30 return for every dollar spent if the proportion of validated BPMDs and staff trained in proper BP measurement technique increased from 20% to 60%. After eight years (2020–2028) and assuming universal validation and training coverage, the returns would be between $2.70 and $3.20 per dollar spent (not including cost of side effects of unnecessary medication or downstream patient impacts from unmanaged hypertension). This modelled economic analysis indicates there will be positive downstream economic benefits if the availability of validated BPMDs is increased. The findings support ongoing efforts toward a universal regulatory framework for BPMDs and can be considered within more detailed future economic analyses.
AB - The VALID BP project was initiated to increase the availability of validated blood pressure measuring devices (BPMDs). The goal is to eliminate non validated BPMDs and minimise over- and underdiagnosis of hypertension caused by inaccurate readings. This study was undertaken to assess the potential return on investment in the VALID BP project. The Framework to Assess the Impact of Translational Health Research was applied to the VALID BP project. This paper focuses on the implementation of the cost benefit analysis aspect of this framework to monetise past research investment and model future research costs, implementation costs, and benefits. Analysis was based on reasoned assumptions about potential impacts from availability and use of validated BPMDs (assuming an end goal of 100% validated BPMDs available in Australia by 2028) and improved skills leading to more accurate BP measurement. After 5 years, with 20% attribution of benefits, there is a potential $1.14–$1.30 return for every dollar spent if the proportion of validated BPMDs and staff trained in proper BP measurement technique increased from 20% to 60%. After eight years (2020–2028) and assuming universal validation and training coverage, the returns would be between $2.70 and $3.20 per dollar spent (not including cost of side effects of unnecessary medication or downstream patient impacts from unmanaged hypertension). This modelled economic analysis indicates there will be positive downstream economic benefits if the availability of validated BPMDs is increased. The findings support ongoing efforts toward a universal regulatory framework for BPMDs and can be considered within more detailed future economic analyses.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85176097686
U2 - 10.1038/s41371-023-00866-2
DO - 10.1038/s41371-023-00866-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 37938294
AN - SCOPUS:85176097686
SN - 0950-9240
VL - 38
SP - 177
EP - 186
JO - Journal of Human Hypertension
JF - Journal of Human Hypertension
IS - 2
ER -