Improving Practice for Urinary Continence Care on Adult Acute Medical and Rehabilitation Wards: A Multi-Site, Co-Created Implementation Study

Dianne Lesley Marsden, Kerry Boyle, Jaclyn Birnie, Amanda Buzio, Joshua Dizon, Judith Dunne, Sandra Greensill, Kelvin Hill, Sandra Lever, Fiona Minett, Sally Ormond, Jodi Shipp, Jennifer Steel, Amanda Styles, John Wiggers, Dominique Ann Michele Cadilhac, Jed Duff, on behalf of the I-SCAMP Project Team

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Many adult inpatients experience urinary continence issues; however, we lack evidence on effective interventions for inpatient continence care. We conducted a before and after implementation study. We implemented our guideline-based intervention using strategies targeting identified barriers and evaluated the impact on urinary continence care provided by inpatient clinicians. Fifteen wards (acute = 3, rehabilitation = 7, acute and rehabilitation = 5) at 12 hospitals (metropolitan = 4, regional = 8) participated. We screened 2298 consecutive adult medical records for evidence of urinary continence symptoms over three 3-month periods: before implementation (T0: n = 849), after the 6-month implementation period (T1: n = 740), and after a 6-month maintenance period (T2: n = 709). The records of symptomatic inpatients were audited for continence assessment, diagnosis, and management plans. All wards contributed data at T0, and 11/15 wards contributed at T1 and T2 (dropouts due to COVID-19). Approximately 26% of stroke, 33% acute medical, and 50% of rehabilitation inpatients were symptomatic. The proportions of symptomatic patients (T0: n = 283, T1: n = 241, T2: n = 256) receiving recommended care were: assessment T0 = 38%, T1 = 63%, T2 = 68%; diagnosis T0 = 30%, T1 = 70%, T2 = 71%; management plan T0 = 7%, T1 = 24%, T2 = 24%. Overall, there were 4-fold increased odds for receiving assessments and management plans and 6-fold greater odds for diagnosis. These improvements were sustained at T2. This intervention has improved inpatient continence care.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1241
Number of pages17
JournalHealthcare
Volume11
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2023

Keywords

  • evidence-based practice
  • hospital
  • implementation science
  • inpatient
  • lower urinary tract symptoms
  • nursing process
  • patient care planning
  • professional practice gaps
  • quality improvement
  • urinary incontinence

Cite this