TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving economic evaluations in stroke
T2 - A report from the ESO Health Economics Working Group
AU - Cadilhac, Dominique A.
AU - Kim, Joosup
AU - Wilson, Alastair
AU - Berge, Eivind
AU - Patel, Anita
AU - Ali, Myzoon
AU - Saver, Jeffrey
AU - Christensen, Hanne
AU - Cuche, Matthieu
AU - Crews, Sean
AU - Wu, Olivia
AU - Provoyeur, Marine
AU - McMeekin, Peter
AU - Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
AU - Ford, Gary A.
AU - Muhlemann, Natalia
AU - Bath, Philip M.
AU - Abdul-Rahim, Azmil H.
AU - Sunnerhagen, Katharina
AU - Meretoja, Atte
AU - Thijs, Vincent
AU - Weimar, Christian
AU - Massaro, Ayrton
AU - Ranta, Annemarei
AU - Lees, Kennedy R.
AU - on behalf of the ESO Health Economics Working group
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Introduction: Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke therapies are varied and inconsistently described. An objective of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Health Economics Working Group is to standardise and improve the economic evaluations of interventions for stroke. Methods: The ESO Health Economics Working Group and additional experts were contacted to develop a protocol and a guidance document for data collection for economic evaluations of stroke therapies. A modified Delphi approach, including a survey and consensus processes, was used to agree on content. We also asked the participants about resources that could be shared to improve economic evaluations of interventions for stroke. Results: Of 28 experts invited, 16 (57%) completed the initial survey, with representation from universities, government, and industry. More than half of the survey respondents endorsed 13 specific items to include in a standard resource use questionnaire. Preferred functional/quality of life outcome measures to use for economic evaluations were the modified Rankin Scale (14 respondents, 88%) and the EQ-5D instrument (11 respondents, 69%). Of the 12 respondents who had access to data used in economic evaluations, 10 (83%) indicated a willingness to share data. A protocol template and a guidance document for data collection were developed and are presented in this article. Conclusion: The protocol template and guidance document for data collection will support a more standardised and transparent approach for economic evaluations of stroke care.
AB - Introduction: Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke therapies are varied and inconsistently described. An objective of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Health Economics Working Group is to standardise and improve the economic evaluations of interventions for stroke. Methods: The ESO Health Economics Working Group and additional experts were contacted to develop a protocol and a guidance document for data collection for economic evaluations of stroke therapies. A modified Delphi approach, including a survey and consensus processes, was used to agree on content. We also asked the participants about resources that could be shared to improve economic evaluations of interventions for stroke. Results: Of 28 experts invited, 16 (57%) completed the initial survey, with representation from universities, government, and industry. More than half of the survey respondents endorsed 13 specific items to include in a standard resource use questionnaire. Preferred functional/quality of life outcome measures to use for economic evaluations were the modified Rankin Scale (14 respondents, 88%) and the EQ-5D instrument (11 respondents, 69%). Of the 12 respondents who had access to data used in economic evaluations, 10 (83%) indicated a willingness to share data. A protocol template and a guidance document for data collection were developed and are presented in this article. Conclusion: The protocol template and guidance document for data collection will support a more standardised and transparent approach for economic evaluations of stroke care.
KW - economic evaluation
KW - EuroQol
KW - health outcomes
KW - health policy
KW - modified Rankin Scale
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078751941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2396987319897466
DO - 10.1177/2396987319897466
M3 - Article
C2 - 32637652
AN - SCOPUS:85078751941
SN - 2396-9873
VL - 5
SP - 184
EP - 192
JO - European Stroke Journal
JF - European Stroke Journal
IS - 2
ER -