Importance of publishing research varies by doctors' career stage, specialty and location of work

Matthew McGrail, Belinda O'Sullivan, Hollie Bendotti, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


Purpose: To investigate whether publishing research is an important aspect of medical careers, and how it varies by specialty and rural or metropolitan location. Methods: Annual national panel survey (postal or online) of Australian doctors between 2008 and 2016, with aggregated participants including 11 263 junior doctors not enrolled in a specialty (€pre-registrars'), 9745 junior doctors enrolled as specialist trainees, non-general practitioner (GP) (€registrars') and 35 983 qualified as specialist consultants, non-GP (€consultants'). Main outcome was in agreement that €research publications are important to progress my training' (junior doctors) or €research publications are important to my career' (consultants). Results: Overall, the highest proportion agreeing were registrars (65%) and pre-registrars (60%), compared with consultants (36%). After accounting for key covariates, rural location was significantly associated with lower importance of publishing research for pre-registrars (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.78) and consultants (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.76), but not for registrars. Compared with anaesthetics, research importance was significantly higher for pre-registrars pursuing surgery (OR 4.46, 95% CI 3.57 to 5.57) and obstetrics/gynaecology careers, for registrars enrolled in surgery (OR 2.97, 95% CI 2.34 to 3.75) and internal medicine training, and consultants of internal medicine (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.08), pathology, radiology and paediatrics. Conclusions: This study provides new quantitative evidence showing that the importance of publishing research is related to medical career stages, and is most important to junior doctors seeking and undertaking different specialty training options. Embedding research requirements more evenly into specialty college selection criteria may stimulate uptake of research. Expansion of rural training pathways should consider capacity building to support increased access to research opportunities in these locations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-204
Number of pages7
JournalPostgraduate Medical Journal
Issue number1122
Publication statusPublished - 29 Mar 2019


  • medical careers
  • postgraduate training
  • research activity
  • rural health
  • specialty college

Cite this