Implementing work-related Mental-health guidelines in general PRacticE (IMPRovE): Findings of a parallel cluster randomised controlled trial

Danielle Mazza, Vera Camões-Costa, Karen Nolidin, Samantha Chakraborty, Justin Kenardy, Bianca Brijnath, Duncan Mortimer, Joanne Enticott, Michael Kidd, Lyndal J. Trevena, Sharon Reid, Alex Collie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background Mental health conditions arising from work are a rapidly increasing burden for individuals, employers and society, and are challenging to diagnose and treat. Objective To assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention on increasing general practitioners' (GPs') adherence to the 'Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of work-related mental-health conditions in general practice' (the Guideline) and improve patient work and health and work outcomes. Methods Pragmatic hybrid III parallel cluster randomised controlled trial involving Australian GPs and their patients. GP clinics were randomly assigned to receive the intervention (GP participation in an academic detailing session, enrolment into a virtual community of practice, and receipt of resources). Those assigned to the control group received no support related to the implementation of the Guideline. GP adherence to guideline recommendations was assessed at baseline and 9 months postbaseline, using virtual simulated patient scenarios (vignettes) describing a diverse range of patient circumstances. Patient work and health outcomes (using the 21-item Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale and 36-item short-form) were assessed using self-report surveys. Findings Thirty-eight intervention clusters (52 GPs) and 36 control clusters (46 GPs) contributed to the primary outcome data. Intervention clusters had significantly higher adherence scores than control clusters, by 0.98 points on a 0-9 scale (95% CI 0.38 to 1.58) with a Cohen's d of 0.67. Patients recruited from 30 intervention (n=99) and 17 control (n=55) clusters contributed to the secondary outcome data. No differences were detected for patients' work or health outcomes due to an underpowered sample. Conclusions GP adherence to the Guideline improved as a result of receiving the multicomponent intervention. Implications Purposively designed multicomponent implementation strategies to increase guideline-concordant care should be incorporated into guideline production activities and operationalised with guideline release to facilitate evidence-based care. Trial Registration number ACTRN12620001163998, November 2020.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Mental Health
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2025

Cite this