Implementing Sustainable Data Collection for a Cardiac Outcomes Registry in an Australian Public Hospital

Nicholas Cox, Angela Brennan, Diem Dinh, Rita Brien, Kath Cowie, Dion Stub, Christopher M. Reid, Jeffrey Lefkovits

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Clinical outcome registries are an increasingly vital component of ensuring quality and safety of patient care. However, Australian hospitals rarely have additional resources or the capacity to fund the additional staff time to complete the task of data collection and entry. At the same time, registry funding models do not support staff for the collection of data at the site but are directed towards the central registry tasks of data reporting, managing and quality monitoring. The sustainability of a registry is contingent on building efficiencies into data management and collection. Methods: We describe the methods used in a large Victorian public hospital to develop a sustainable data collection system for the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR), using existing staff and resources common to many public hospitals. We describe the features of the registry and the hospital specific strategies that allowed us to do this as part of our routine business of providing good quality cardiac care. Results: All clinical staff involved in patient care were given some data collection task with the entry of these data embedded into the staff's daily workflow. A senior cardiology registrar was empowered to allocate data entry tasks to colleagues when data were found to be incomplete. The task of 30-day follow-up proved the most onerous part of data collection. Cath-lab nursing staff were allocated this role. Conclusion: With hospital accreditation and funding models moving towards performance based quality indicators, collection of accurate and reliable information is crucial. Our experience demonstrates the successful implementation of clinical outcome registry data collection in a financially constrained public hospital environment utilising existing resources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-468
Number of pages5
JournalHeart Lung and Circulation
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Cardiac outcomes
  • Data Collection
  • Registry

Cite this

@article{71d9633989c24877bf88ddec199c0ee1,
title = "Implementing Sustainable Data Collection for a Cardiac Outcomes Registry in an Australian Public Hospital",
abstract = "Background: Clinical outcome registries are an increasingly vital component of ensuring quality and safety of patient care. However, Australian hospitals rarely have additional resources or the capacity to fund the additional staff time to complete the task of data collection and entry. At the same time, registry funding models do not support staff for the collection of data at the site but are directed towards the central registry tasks of data reporting, managing and quality monitoring. The sustainability of a registry is contingent on building efficiencies into data management and collection. Methods: We describe the methods used in a large Victorian public hospital to develop a sustainable data collection system for the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR), using existing staff and resources common to many public hospitals. We describe the features of the registry and the hospital specific strategies that allowed us to do this as part of our routine business of providing good quality cardiac care. Results: All clinical staff involved in patient care were given some data collection task with the entry of these data embedded into the staff's daily workflow. A senior cardiology registrar was empowered to allocate data entry tasks to colleagues when data were found to be incomplete. The task of 30-day follow-up proved the most onerous part of data collection. Cath-lab nursing staff were allocated this role. Conclusion: With hospital accreditation and funding models moving towards performance based quality indicators, collection of accurate and reliable information is crucial. Our experience demonstrates the successful implementation of clinical outcome registry data collection in a financially constrained public hospital environment utilising existing resources.",
keywords = "Cardiac outcomes, Data Collection, Registry",
author = "Nicholas Cox and Angela Brennan and Diem Dinh and Rita Brien and Kath Cowie and Dion Stub and Reid, {Christopher M.} and Jeffrey Lefkovits",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.023",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "464--468",
journal = "Heart Lung and Circulation",
issn = "1443-9506",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Implementing Sustainable Data Collection for a Cardiac Outcomes Registry in an Australian Public Hospital. / Cox, Nicholas; Brennan, Angela; Dinh, Diem; Brien, Rita; Cowie, Kath; Stub, Dion; Reid, Christopher M.; Lefkovits, Jeffrey.

In: Heart Lung and Circulation, Vol. 27, No. 4, 04.2018, p. 464-468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing Sustainable Data Collection for a Cardiac Outcomes Registry in an Australian Public Hospital

AU - Cox, Nicholas

AU - Brennan, Angela

AU - Dinh, Diem

AU - Brien, Rita

AU - Cowie, Kath

AU - Stub, Dion

AU - Reid, Christopher M.

AU - Lefkovits, Jeffrey

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Background: Clinical outcome registries are an increasingly vital component of ensuring quality and safety of patient care. However, Australian hospitals rarely have additional resources or the capacity to fund the additional staff time to complete the task of data collection and entry. At the same time, registry funding models do not support staff for the collection of data at the site but are directed towards the central registry tasks of data reporting, managing and quality monitoring. The sustainability of a registry is contingent on building efficiencies into data management and collection. Methods: We describe the methods used in a large Victorian public hospital to develop a sustainable data collection system for the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR), using existing staff and resources common to many public hospitals. We describe the features of the registry and the hospital specific strategies that allowed us to do this as part of our routine business of providing good quality cardiac care. Results: All clinical staff involved in patient care were given some data collection task with the entry of these data embedded into the staff's daily workflow. A senior cardiology registrar was empowered to allocate data entry tasks to colleagues when data were found to be incomplete. The task of 30-day follow-up proved the most onerous part of data collection. Cath-lab nursing staff were allocated this role. Conclusion: With hospital accreditation and funding models moving towards performance based quality indicators, collection of accurate and reliable information is crucial. Our experience demonstrates the successful implementation of clinical outcome registry data collection in a financially constrained public hospital environment utilising existing resources.

AB - Background: Clinical outcome registries are an increasingly vital component of ensuring quality and safety of patient care. However, Australian hospitals rarely have additional resources or the capacity to fund the additional staff time to complete the task of data collection and entry. At the same time, registry funding models do not support staff for the collection of data at the site but are directed towards the central registry tasks of data reporting, managing and quality monitoring. The sustainability of a registry is contingent on building efficiencies into data management and collection. Methods: We describe the methods used in a large Victorian public hospital to develop a sustainable data collection system for the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR), using existing staff and resources common to many public hospitals. We describe the features of the registry and the hospital specific strategies that allowed us to do this as part of our routine business of providing good quality cardiac care. Results: All clinical staff involved in patient care were given some data collection task with the entry of these data embedded into the staff's daily workflow. A senior cardiology registrar was empowered to allocate data entry tasks to colleagues when data were found to be incomplete. The task of 30-day follow-up proved the most onerous part of data collection. Cath-lab nursing staff were allocated this role. Conclusion: With hospital accreditation and funding models moving towards performance based quality indicators, collection of accurate and reliable information is crucial. Our experience demonstrates the successful implementation of clinical outcome registry data collection in a financially constrained public hospital environment utilising existing resources.

KW - Cardiac outcomes

KW - Data Collection

KW - Registry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028317875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.023

DO - 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.023

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 464

EP - 468

JO - Heart Lung and Circulation

JF - Heart Lung and Circulation

SN - 1443-9506

IS - 4

ER -