Impacts of varying concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei on deep convective cloud updrafts a multimodel assessment

Peter J. Marinescu, Susan C. Van Den Heever, Max Heikenfeld, Andrew I. Barrett, Christian Barthlott, Corinna Hoose, Jiwen Fan, Ann M. Fridlind, Toshi Matsui, Annette K. Miltenberger, Philip Stier, Benoit Vie, Bethan A. White, Yuwei Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents results from a model intercomparison project, focusing on the range of responses in deep convective cloud updrafts to varying cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations among seven state-of-The-Art cloudresolving models. Simulations of scattered convective clouds near Houston, Texas, are conducted, after being initialized with both relatively low and high CCN concentrations. Deep convective updrafts are identified, and trends in the updraft intensity and frequency are assessed. The factors contributing to the vertical velocity tendencies are examined to identify the physical processes associated with the CCN-induced updraft changes. The models show several consistent trends. In general, the changes between theHigh-CCNandLow-CCNsimulations in updraftmagnitudes throughout the depth of the troposphere are within 15%for all of themodels.Allmodels produce stronger (;15% 15%)mean updrafts from;4 7 kmabove ground level (AGL) in the High-CCN simulations, followed by a waning response up to ;8 km AGL in most of the models. Thermal buoyancy was more sensitive than condensate loading to varying CCN concentrations in most of the models and more impactful in the mean updraft responses. However, there are also differences between the models. The change in the amount of deep convective updrafts varies significantly. Furthermore, approximately half the models demonstrate neutral-To-weaker (;25% to 0%) updrafts above ;8 km AGL, while the other models show stronger (;110%) updrafts in the High-CCN simulations. The combination of the CCN-induced impacts on the buoyancy and vertical perturbation pressure gradient terms better explains these middle-and upper-Tropospheric updraft trends than the buoyancy terms alone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1147-1172
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Volume78
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Aerosol indirect effect
  • Aerosol-cloud interaction
  • Cloud microphysics
  • Cloud resolving models
  • Convective-scale processes
  • Model comparison
  • Updrafts/downdrafts

Cite this