TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of idling on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions and available idle-reduction technologies for diesel vehicles - A review
AU - Rahman, S. M.Ashrafur
AU - Masjuki, H. H.
AU - Kalam, M. A.
AU - Abedin, M. J.
AU - Sanjid, A.
AU - Sajjad, H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to appreciate University of Malaya for financial support through High Impact Research grant titled: Clean Diesel Technology for Military and Civilian Transport Vehicles having Grant Number UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/07.
Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In order to maintain cab comfort truck drivers have to idle their engine to obtain the required power for accessories, such as the air conditioner, heater, television, refrigerator, and lights. This idling of the engine has a major impact on its fuel consumption and exhaust emission. Idling emissions can be as high as 86.4 g/h, 16,500 g/h, 5130 g/h, 4 g/h, and 375 g/h for HC, CO 2, CO, PM, and NOx, respectively. Idling fuel consumption rate can be as high as 1.85 gal/h. The accessory loading, truck model, fuel-injection system, ambient temperature, idling speed, etc., also affect significantly the emission levels and fuel consumption rate. An increase in accessory loading and ambient temperature increases the emissions and fuel consumption. During idling, electronic fuel-injection systems reduce HC, PM, and CO emission, but increase NOx emissions compared with a mechanical fuel-injection system. An increase of idling speed increases fuel consumption rate. There are many systems available on the market to reduce engine idling and improve air quality and fuel consumption rate, such as an auxiliary power unit (APU), truck stop electrification, thermal storage systems, fuel cells, and direct fire heaters. A direct fire heater reduces fuel consumption by 94-96% and an APU reduces consumption by 60-87%. Furthermore, these technologies increase air quality significantly by reducing idling emissions, which is the reason why they are considered as key alternatives to engine idling.
AB - In order to maintain cab comfort truck drivers have to idle their engine to obtain the required power for accessories, such as the air conditioner, heater, television, refrigerator, and lights. This idling of the engine has a major impact on its fuel consumption and exhaust emission. Idling emissions can be as high as 86.4 g/h, 16,500 g/h, 5130 g/h, 4 g/h, and 375 g/h for HC, CO 2, CO, PM, and NOx, respectively. Idling fuel consumption rate can be as high as 1.85 gal/h. The accessory loading, truck model, fuel-injection system, ambient temperature, idling speed, etc., also affect significantly the emission levels and fuel consumption rate. An increase in accessory loading and ambient temperature increases the emissions and fuel consumption. During idling, electronic fuel-injection systems reduce HC, PM, and CO emission, but increase NOx emissions compared with a mechanical fuel-injection system. An increase of idling speed increases fuel consumption rate. There are many systems available on the market to reduce engine idling and improve air quality and fuel consumption rate, such as an auxiliary power unit (APU), truck stop electrification, thermal storage systems, fuel cells, and direct fire heaters. A direct fire heater reduces fuel consumption by 94-96% and an APU reduces consumption by 60-87%. Furthermore, these technologies increase air quality significantly by reducing idling emissions, which is the reason why they are considered as key alternatives to engine idling.
KW - Diesel engine
KW - Exhaust emission
KW - Fuel consumption
KW - Human health
KW - Idle
KW - Idle-reduction technologies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879053450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.05.019
DO - 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.05.019
M3 - Review Article
AN - SCOPUS:84879053450
VL - 74
SP - 171
EP - 182
JO - Energy Conversion and Management
JF - Energy Conversion and Management
SN - 0196-8904
ER -