Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes

Protocol for a systematic review

Dewan Md Emdadul Hoque, Varuni Kumari, Rasa Ruseckaite, Lorena Romero, Susan M Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Many developed countries have regional and national clinical registries aimed at improving health outcomes of patients diagnosed with particular diseases or cared for in particular healthcare settings. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are clinical registries established with the purpose of monitoring quality of care and providing feedback to improve health outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to understand the impact of CQRs on (1) mortality/ survival; (2) measures of outcome that reflect a process or outcome of healthcare; (3) healthcare utilisation and (4) costs. Methods and analysis: The PRISMA-P methodology, checklist and standard strategy using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and structured data abstraction tools will be followed. A search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL will be undertaken, in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature, to identify studies in English covering the period January 1980 to December 2014. Case-control, cohort, randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials which describe the registry as an intervention will be eligible for inclusion. Narrative synthesis of study findings will be conducted, guided by a conceptual framework developed to analyse the outcome measure of the registry using defined criteria. If sufficient studies are identified with a similar outcome of interest and measure using the same comparator and time of interval, results will be pooled for random-effects meta-analysis. Test for heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. To identify reporting bias, forest plots and funnel plots will be created and, if required, Egger s test will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Review results will be published as a part of thesis, peerreviewed journal and conferences.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere010654
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Open
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Apr 2016

Cite this

@article{6d28c63618784be7836c115ab085c81a,
title = "Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: Protocol for a systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: Many developed countries have regional and national clinical registries aimed at improving health outcomes of patients diagnosed with particular diseases or cared for in particular healthcare settings. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are clinical registries established with the purpose of monitoring quality of care and providing feedback to improve health outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to understand the impact of CQRs on (1) mortality/ survival; (2) measures of outcome that reflect a process or outcome of healthcare; (3) healthcare utilisation and (4) costs. Methods and analysis: The PRISMA-P methodology, checklist and standard strategy using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and structured data abstraction tools will be followed. A search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL will be undertaken, in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature, to identify studies in English covering the period January 1980 to December 2014. Case-control, cohort, randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials which describe the registry as an intervention will be eligible for inclusion. Narrative synthesis of study findings will be conducted, guided by a conceptual framework developed to analyse the outcome measure of the registry using defined criteria. If sufficient studies are identified with a similar outcome of interest and measure using the same comparator and time of interval, results will be pooled for random-effects meta-analysis. Test for heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. To identify reporting bias, forest plots and funnel plots will be created and, if required, Egger s test will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Review results will be published as a part of thesis, peerreviewed journal and conferences.",
author = "Hoque, {Dewan Md Emdadul} and Varuni Kumari and Rasa Ruseckaite and Lorena Romero and Evans, {Susan M}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010654",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes : Protocol for a systematic review. / Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul; Kumari, Varuni ; Ruseckaite, Rasa; Romero, Lorena; Evans, Susan M.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 6, No. 4, e010654, 26.04.2016, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes

T2 - Protocol for a systematic review

AU - Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul

AU - Kumari, Varuni

AU - Ruseckaite, Rasa

AU - Romero, Lorena

AU - Evans, Susan M

PY - 2016/4/26

Y1 - 2016/4/26

N2 - Introduction: Many developed countries have regional and national clinical registries aimed at improving health outcomes of patients diagnosed with particular diseases or cared for in particular healthcare settings. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are clinical registries established with the purpose of monitoring quality of care and providing feedback to improve health outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to understand the impact of CQRs on (1) mortality/ survival; (2) measures of outcome that reflect a process or outcome of healthcare; (3) healthcare utilisation and (4) costs. Methods and analysis: The PRISMA-P methodology, checklist and standard strategy using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and structured data abstraction tools will be followed. A search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL will be undertaken, in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature, to identify studies in English covering the period January 1980 to December 2014. Case-control, cohort, randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials which describe the registry as an intervention will be eligible for inclusion. Narrative synthesis of study findings will be conducted, guided by a conceptual framework developed to analyse the outcome measure of the registry using defined criteria. If sufficient studies are identified with a similar outcome of interest and measure using the same comparator and time of interval, results will be pooled for random-effects meta-analysis. Test for heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. To identify reporting bias, forest plots and funnel plots will be created and, if required, Egger s test will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Review results will be published as a part of thesis, peerreviewed journal and conferences.

AB - Introduction: Many developed countries have regional and national clinical registries aimed at improving health outcomes of patients diagnosed with particular diseases or cared for in particular healthcare settings. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are clinical registries established with the purpose of monitoring quality of care and providing feedback to improve health outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to understand the impact of CQRs on (1) mortality/ survival; (2) measures of outcome that reflect a process or outcome of healthcare; (3) healthcare utilisation and (4) costs. Methods and analysis: The PRISMA-P methodology, checklist and standard strategy using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and structured data abstraction tools will be followed. A search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL will be undertaken, in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature, to identify studies in English covering the period January 1980 to December 2014. Case-control, cohort, randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials which describe the registry as an intervention will be eligible for inclusion. Narrative synthesis of study findings will be conducted, guided by a conceptual framework developed to analyse the outcome measure of the registry using defined criteria. If sufficient studies are identified with a similar outcome of interest and measure using the same comparator and time of interval, results will be pooled for random-effects meta-analysis. Test for heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. To identify reporting bias, forest plots and funnel plots will be created and, if required, Egger s test will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Review results will be published as a part of thesis, peerreviewed journal and conferences.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853981/pdf/bmjopen-2015-010654.pdf

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010654

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010654

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 4

M1 - e010654

ER -