Abstract
In this article, I examine the changing nature of punishment under conditions of mass mobility. Drawing on research conducted in immigration removal centres in the UK, I will show how porous boundaries between administrative penalties and criminal penalties have made the two systems co-constitutive and, in so doing, have drawn into question the liberal foundations of punishment. As foreigners face additional, administrative burdens and are subject to processes of differentiation and exclusion simply by virtue of their citizenship, I suggest, basic values of due process, fairness and equality of treatment and outcome, are drawn into question. As a consequence, justice itself is transformed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 81-99 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Social and Legal Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Administrative power
- border criminology
- immigration detention
- mass mobility
- punishment
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver