Idiom Variation

Experimental Data and a Blueprint of a Computational Model

Kristina Geeraert, John Newman, R. Harald Baayen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Corpus surveys have shown that the exact forms with which idioms are realized are subject to variation. We report a rating experiment showing that such alternative realizations have varying degrees of acceptability. Idiom variation challenges processing theories associating idioms with fixed multi-word form units (Bobrow & Bell, 1973), fixed configurations of words (Cacciari & Tabossi, 1988), or fixed superlemmas (Sprenger, Levelt, & Kempen, 2006), as they do not explain how it can be that speakers produce variant forms that listeners can still make sense of. A computational model simulating comprehension with naive discriminative learning is introduced that provides an explanation for the different degrees of acceptability of several idiom variant types. Implications for multi-word units in general are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)653-669
Number of pages17
JournalTopics in Cognitive Science
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Acceptability ratings
  • Computational modeling
  • Idiom variation
  • Naive discriminative learning
  • Salience

Cite this

Geeraert, Kristina ; Newman, John ; Baayen, R. Harald. / Idiom Variation : Experimental Data and a Blueprint of a Computational Model. In: Topics in Cognitive Science. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 653-669.
@article{ffd618aca27940f0bf7d00a83f0cbc10,
title = "Idiom Variation: Experimental Data and a Blueprint of a Computational Model",
abstract = "Corpus surveys have shown that the exact forms with which idioms are realized are subject to variation. We report a rating experiment showing that such alternative realizations have varying degrees of acceptability. Idiom variation challenges processing theories associating idioms with fixed multi-word form units (Bobrow & Bell, 1973), fixed configurations of words (Cacciari & Tabossi, 1988), or fixed superlemmas (Sprenger, Levelt, & Kempen, 2006), as they do not explain how it can be that speakers produce variant forms that listeners can still make sense of. A computational model simulating comprehension with naive discriminative learning is introduced that provides an explanation for the different degrees of acceptability of several idiom variant types. Implications for multi-word units in general are discussed.",
keywords = "Acceptability ratings, Computational modeling, Idiom variation, Naive discriminative learning, Salience",
author = "Kristina Geeraert and John Newman and Baayen, {R. Harald}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/tops.12263",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "653--669",
journal = "Topics in Cognitive Science",
issn = "1756-8757",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Idiom Variation : Experimental Data and a Blueprint of a Computational Model. / Geeraert, Kristina; Newman, John; Baayen, R. Harald.

In: Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.07.2017, p. 653-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Idiom Variation

T2 - Experimental Data and a Blueprint of a Computational Model

AU - Geeraert, Kristina

AU - Newman, John

AU - Baayen, R. Harald

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Corpus surveys have shown that the exact forms with which idioms are realized are subject to variation. We report a rating experiment showing that such alternative realizations have varying degrees of acceptability. Idiom variation challenges processing theories associating idioms with fixed multi-word form units (Bobrow & Bell, 1973), fixed configurations of words (Cacciari & Tabossi, 1988), or fixed superlemmas (Sprenger, Levelt, & Kempen, 2006), as they do not explain how it can be that speakers produce variant forms that listeners can still make sense of. A computational model simulating comprehension with naive discriminative learning is introduced that provides an explanation for the different degrees of acceptability of several idiom variant types. Implications for multi-word units in general are discussed.

AB - Corpus surveys have shown that the exact forms with which idioms are realized are subject to variation. We report a rating experiment showing that such alternative realizations have varying degrees of acceptability. Idiom variation challenges processing theories associating idioms with fixed multi-word form units (Bobrow & Bell, 1973), fixed configurations of words (Cacciari & Tabossi, 1988), or fixed superlemmas (Sprenger, Levelt, & Kempen, 2006), as they do not explain how it can be that speakers produce variant forms that listeners can still make sense of. A computational model simulating comprehension with naive discriminative learning is introduced that provides an explanation for the different degrees of acceptability of several idiom variant types. Implications for multi-word units in general are discussed.

KW - Acceptability ratings

KW - Computational modeling

KW - Idiom variation

KW - Naive discriminative learning

KW - Salience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023756330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/tops.12263

DO - 10.1111/tops.12263

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 653

EP - 669

JO - Topics in Cognitive Science

JF - Topics in Cognitive Science

SN - 1756-8757

IS - 3

ER -