TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying marginal treatment effects in the presence of sample selection
AU - Bartalotti, Otávio
AU - Kédagni, Désiré
AU - Possebom, Vitor
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Editor Elie Tamer, an Associate Editor, and two anonymous referees for constructive feedback that helped to improve the quality of the paper. We also thank Joseph Altonji, Nathan Barker, Michael Bates, Ivan Canay, Xiaohong Chen, Xuan Chen, Michael Darden, Nino Doghonadze, John Finlay, Carlos A. Flores, Thomas Fujiwara, Dalia Ghanem, John Eric Humphries, Yuichi Kitamura, Marianne Köhli, Helena Laneuville, Jaewon Lee, Giovanni Mellace, Ismael Mourifié, Yusuke Narita, Pedro Sant'Anna, Masayuki Sawada, Azeem Shaikh, Edward Vytlacil, Stephanie Weber, Siuyuat Wong and seminar participants at Iowa State University, University of Iowa, Yale University, UC Davis, UC-Riverside, UNC-Chapel Hill, CEME Conference for Young Econometricians 2019, IZA/CREST Conference on Labor Market Policy Evaluation, Southern Denmark University, Statistics Norway, CMStatistics 2019, the Bristol Econometrics Study Group 2019 and the 42nd Meeting of the Brazilian Econometric Society for helpful discussions, and Seung Jin Cho for excellent research assistance. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - This article presents identification results for the marginal treatment effect (MTE) when there is sample selection. We show that the MTE is partially identified for individuals who are always observed regardless of treatment, and derive uniformly sharp bounds on this parameter under three increasingly restrictive sets of assumptions. The first result imposes standard MTE assumptions with an unrestricted sample selection mechanism. The second set of conditions imposes monotonicity of the sample selection variable with respect to treatment, considerably shrinking the identified set. Finally, we incorporate a stochastic dominance assumption which tightens the lower bound for the MTE. Our analysis extends to discrete instruments. The results rely on a mixture reformulation of the problem where the mixture weights are identified, extending Lee's (2009) trimming procedure to the MTE context. We propose estimators for the bounds derived and use data made available by Deb et al. (2006) to empirically illustrate the usefulness of our approach.
AB - This article presents identification results for the marginal treatment effect (MTE) when there is sample selection. We show that the MTE is partially identified for individuals who are always observed regardless of treatment, and derive uniformly sharp bounds on this parameter under three increasingly restrictive sets of assumptions. The first result imposes standard MTE assumptions with an unrestricted sample selection mechanism. The second set of conditions imposes monotonicity of the sample selection variable with respect to treatment, considerably shrinking the identified set. Finally, we incorporate a stochastic dominance assumption which tightens the lower bound for the MTE. Our analysis extends to discrete instruments. The results rely on a mixture reformulation of the problem where the mixture weights are identified, extending Lee's (2009) trimming procedure to the MTE context. We propose estimators for the bounds derived and use data made available by Deb et al. (2006) to empirically illustrate the usefulness of our approach.
KW - Instrumental variable
KW - Marginal treatment effect
KW - Partial identification
KW - Program evaluation
KW - Sample selection
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85121979768
U2 - 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.11.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.11.011
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121979768
SN - 0304-4076
VL - 234
SP - 565
EP - 584
JO - Journal of Econometrics
JF - Journal of Econometrics
IS - 2
ER -