TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying lupus Patient Subsets Through Immune Cell Deconvolution of Gene Expression Data in Two Atacicept Phase II Studies
AU - Studham, Matthew
AU - Vazquez-Mateo, Cristina
AU - Samy, Eileen
AU - Haselmayer, Philipp
AU - Aydemir, Aida
AU - Rolfe, P. Alexander
AU - Merrill, Joan T.
AU - Morand, Eric F.
AU - DeMartino, Julie
AU - Kao, Amy
AU - Townsend, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
EMD Serono was involved in the study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and the writing of the manuscript. The authors thank Peter Chang (Biostatistics, EMD Serono) for his input and advice on the analysis of the APRIL‐SLE data. Medical writing support was provided by Samantha Lommano of Bioscript Group Ltd, Macclesfield, UK, which was funded by the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 EMD Serono, Inc and The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Objective: To use cell-based gene signatures to identify patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) in the phase II/III APRIL–SLE and phase IIb ADDRESS II trials most likely to respond to atacicept. Methods: A published immune cell deconvolution algorithm based on Affymetrix gene array data was applied to whole blood gene expression from patients entering APRIL-SLE. Five distinct patient clusters were identified. Patient characteristics, biomarkers, and clinical response to atacicept were assessed per cluster. A modified immune cell deconvolution algorithm was developed based on RNA sequencing data and applied to ADDRESS II data to identify similar patient clusters and their responses. Results: Patients in APRIL-SLE (N = 105) were segregated into the following five clusters (P1-5) characterized by dominant cell subset signatures: high neutrophils, T helper cells and natural killer (NK) cells (P1), high plasma cells and activated NK cells (P2), high B cells and neutrophils (P3), high B cells and low neutrophils (P4), or high activated dendritic cells, activated NK cells, and neutrophils (P5). Placebo- and atacicept-treated patients in clusters P2,4,5 had markedly higher British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A/B flare rates than those in clusters P1,3, with a greater treatment effect of atacicept on lowering flares in clusters P2,4,5. In ADDRESS II, placebo-treated patients from P2,4,5 were less likely to be SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4, SRI-6, and BILAG-Based Combined Lupus Assessment responders than those in P1,3; the response proportions again suggested lower placebo effect and a greater treatment differential for atacicept in P2,4,5. Conclusion: This exploratory analysis indicates larger differences between placebo- and atacicept-treated patients with SLE in a molecularly defined patient subset.
AB - Objective: To use cell-based gene signatures to identify patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) in the phase II/III APRIL–SLE and phase IIb ADDRESS II trials most likely to respond to atacicept. Methods: A published immune cell deconvolution algorithm based on Affymetrix gene array data was applied to whole blood gene expression from patients entering APRIL-SLE. Five distinct patient clusters were identified. Patient characteristics, biomarkers, and clinical response to atacicept were assessed per cluster. A modified immune cell deconvolution algorithm was developed based on RNA sequencing data and applied to ADDRESS II data to identify similar patient clusters and their responses. Results: Patients in APRIL-SLE (N = 105) were segregated into the following five clusters (P1-5) characterized by dominant cell subset signatures: high neutrophils, T helper cells and natural killer (NK) cells (P1), high plasma cells and activated NK cells (P2), high B cells and neutrophils (P3), high B cells and low neutrophils (P4), or high activated dendritic cells, activated NK cells, and neutrophils (P5). Placebo- and atacicept-treated patients in clusters P2,4,5 had markedly higher British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A/B flare rates than those in clusters P1,3, with a greater treatment effect of atacicept on lowering flares in clusters P2,4,5. In ADDRESS II, placebo-treated patients from P2,4,5 were less likely to be SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4, SRI-6, and BILAG-Based Combined Lupus Assessment responders than those in P1,3; the response proportions again suggested lower placebo effect and a greater treatment differential for atacicept in P2,4,5. Conclusion: This exploratory analysis indicates larger differences between placebo- and atacicept-treated patients with SLE in a molecularly defined patient subset.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170852176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/acr2.11594
DO - 10.1002/acr2.11594
M3 - Article
C2 - 37710418
AN - SCOPUS:85170852176
SN - 2578-5745
VL - 5
SP - 536
EP - 546
JO - ACR Open Rheumatology
JF - ACR Open Rheumatology
IS - 10
ER -