Identifying lupus Patient Subsets Through Immune Cell Deconvolution of Gene Expression Data in Two Atacicept Phase II Studies

Matthew Studham, Cristina Vazquez-Mateo, Eileen Samy, Philipp Haselmayer, Aida Aydemir, P. Alexander Rolfe, Joan T. Merrill, Eric F. Morand, Julie DeMartino, Amy Kao, Robert Townsend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To use cell-based gene signatures to identify patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) in the phase II/III APRIL–SLE and phase IIb ADDRESS II trials most likely to respond to atacicept. Methods: A published immune cell deconvolution algorithm based on Affymetrix gene array data was applied to whole blood gene expression from patients entering APRIL-SLE. Five distinct patient clusters were identified. Patient characteristics, biomarkers, and clinical response to atacicept were assessed per cluster. A modified immune cell deconvolution algorithm was developed based on RNA sequencing data and applied to ADDRESS II data to identify similar patient clusters and their responses. Results: Patients in APRIL-SLE (N = 105) were segregated into the following five clusters (P1-5) characterized by dominant cell subset signatures: high neutrophils, T helper cells and natural killer (NK) cells (P1), high plasma cells and activated NK cells (P2), high B cells and neutrophils (P3), high B cells and low neutrophils (P4), or high activated dendritic cells, activated NK cells, and neutrophils (P5). Placebo- and atacicept-treated patients in clusters P2,4,5 had markedly higher British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A/B flare rates than those in clusters P1,3, with a greater treatment effect of atacicept on lowering flares in clusters P2,4,5. In ADDRESS II, placebo-treated patients from P2,4,5 were less likely to be SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4, SRI-6, and BILAG-Based Combined Lupus Assessment responders than those in P1,3; the response proportions again suggested lower placebo effect and a greater treatment differential for atacicept in P2,4,5. Conclusion: This exploratory analysis indicates larger differences between placebo- and atacicept-treated patients with SLE in a molecularly defined patient subset.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536–546
Number of pages11
JournalACR Open Rheumatology
Volume5
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Cite this