Identifying Key Drivers of the Impact of an HIV Cure Intervention in Sub-Saharan Africa

Andrew N. Phillips, Valentina Cambiano, Paul Revill, Fumiyo Nakagawa, Jens Dilling Lundgren, Loveleen Bansi-Matharu, Travor Mabugu, Mark Sculpher, Geoff Garnett, Silvija Staprans, Stephen Becker, Joseph Murungu, Sharon R. Lewin, Steven G. Deeks, Timothy B. Hallett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)


Background. It is unknown what properties would be required to make an intervention in low income countries that can eradicate or control human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) without antiretroviral therapy (ART) cost-effective. Methods. We used a model of HIV and ART to investigate the effect of introducing an ART-free viral suppression intervention in 2022 using Zimbabwe as an example country. We assumed that the intervention (cost: $500) would be accessible for 90% of the population, be given to those receiving effective ART, have sufficient efficacy to allow ART interruption in 95%, with a rate of viral rebound of 5% per year in the first 3 months, and a 50% decline in rate with each successive year. Results. An ART-free viral suppression intervention with these properties would result in >0.53 million disability-adjusted-life-years averted over 2022-2042, with a reduction in HIV program costs of $300 million (8.7% saving). An intervention of this efficacy costing anything up to $1400 is likely to be cost-effective in this setting. Conclusions. Interventions aimed at curing HIV infection have the potential to improve overall disease burden and to reduce costs. Given the effectiveness and cost of ART, such interventions would have to be inexpensive and highly effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-79
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of Infectious Diseases
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016


  • antiretroviral therapy
  • cure
  • economic evaluation
  • HIV
  • model

Cite this