Hylomorphism: what’s not to like?

John Heil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The paper comprises an attempt on the part of the author to understand what hylomorphism is, both in its original Aristotelian guise, and in recent work by philosophers who defend what they call hylomorphism. Two species or strands of hylomorphism are identified and discussed. Universals, essences, and substantial and accidental forms make cameo appearances, and the implications of an Aristotelian ontology of stuffs are explored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalSynthese
Volume198
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Accidental form
  • Aristotelianism
  • Aristotle
  • Essence
  • Hylomorphism
  • Individual form
  • Prime matter
  • Substantial form

Cite this