Hurka's Gamble and Methuselah's Paradox: a response to Cowen on normative population theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


The principle of total utility in population choice is seriously challenged by Hurka's Gamble and Methuselah's Paradox (and the associated Lewis-Cowen Theory). This paper defends the principle of total utility by attempting to resolve these apparent paradoxes by an opposite gamble and some other explanations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-49
Number of pages5
JournalSocial Choice and Welfare
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1989

Cite this