How university teachers design assessments

a cross-disciplinary study

Margaret Bearman, Phillip Dawson, Sue Bennett, Matt Hall, Elizabeth Molloy, David Boud, Gordon Joughin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are dissonances between educators’ aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed ‘on the ground’ can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-64
Number of pages16
JournalHigher Education
Volume74
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Academic context
  • Academic experiences
  • Academic practice
  • Assessment
  • Teaching skills

Cite this

Bearman, Margaret ; Dawson, Phillip ; Bennett, Sue ; Hall, Matt ; Molloy, Elizabeth ; Boud, David ; Joughin, Gordon. / How university teachers design assessments : a cross-disciplinary study. In: Higher Education. 2017 ; Vol. 74, No. 1. pp. 49-64.
@article{42b181a132384ec9ad7aa2d014ebc1db,
title = "How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study",
abstract = "There are dissonances between educators’ aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed ‘on the ground’ can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research.",
keywords = "Academic context, Academic experiences, Academic practice, Assessment, Teaching skills",
author = "Margaret Bearman and Phillip Dawson and Sue Bennett and Matt Hall and Elizabeth Molloy and David Boud and Gordon Joughin",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "49--64",
journal = "Higher Education",
issn = "0018-1560",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

How university teachers design assessments : a cross-disciplinary study. / Bearman, Margaret; Dawson, Phillip; Bennett, Sue; Hall, Matt; Molloy, Elizabeth; Boud, David; Joughin, Gordon.

In: Higher Education, Vol. 74, No. 1, 07.2017, p. 49-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How university teachers design assessments

T2 - a cross-disciplinary study

AU - Bearman, Margaret

AU - Dawson, Phillip

AU - Bennett, Sue

AU - Hall, Matt

AU - Molloy, Elizabeth

AU - Boud, David

AU - Joughin, Gordon

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - There are dissonances between educators’ aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed ‘on the ground’ can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research.

AB - There are dissonances between educators’ aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed ‘on the ground’ can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research.

KW - Academic context

KW - Academic experiences

KW - Academic practice

KW - Assessment

KW - Teaching skills

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979639119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7

DO - 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 49

EP - 64

JO - Higher Education

JF - Higher Education

SN - 0018-1560

IS - 1

ER -