TY - JOUR
T1 - How sustainable is CO2conversion to ethanol? - a life cycle assessment of a new electrocatalytic carbon utilisation process
AU - Rojas Sánchez, Daniel
AU - Khalilpour, Kaveh
AU - Hoadley, Andrew F.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the following people for their expert advice in different sections of the modelling of this assessment: Niklas von der Assen, Doug MacFarlane, Paul Webley, Xue Wang, Edward Sargent, Joel Ager, Timothy Grant, and Keith Sharp. We would also like to show our gratitude to Monash University for providing the resources to elaborate this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021.
PY - 2021/10/5
Y1 - 2021/10/5
N2 - Although bioethanol production is considered to be sustainable from a global warming perspective, its dependence on agricultural systems, land management, and geographical limitations has sparked concern. The electrocatalytic CO2reduction reaction (CO2RR) is a promising alternative pathway to produce fuels, such as ethanol, through captured CO2and electricity. The CO2RR has been studied exhaustively in the literature, but the potential environmental impacts of producing ethanol in a practical process on a large scale are unknown. In this paper, we perform a life cycle assessment to quantify the potential environmental benefits of ethanol productionviaa proposed electrocatalytic captured CO2reduction (ECCR) system coupled with an innovative product separation design at a commercially relevant scale. The production of bioethanolviagrain fermentation was used as the reference in the comparison of nine environmental impact categories. Results indicate that ethanolviaECCR has a lower or comparable associated impact in all examined environmental categories, depending on the nature of the energy supplied to the system. Specifically for global warming, the ECCR becomes competitive against the reference when the electricity supplied has a carbon intensity lower than 63 gCO2eq per kW h. Overall, the proposed ECCR system is a modular and versatile alternative that presents a clear advantage on land use and water consumption. This early-stage technology has the capability of producing ethanol sustainably whilst offering the associated benefits of a carbon capture and utilisation pathway.
AB - Although bioethanol production is considered to be sustainable from a global warming perspective, its dependence on agricultural systems, land management, and geographical limitations has sparked concern. The electrocatalytic CO2reduction reaction (CO2RR) is a promising alternative pathway to produce fuels, such as ethanol, through captured CO2and electricity. The CO2RR has been studied exhaustively in the literature, but the potential environmental impacts of producing ethanol in a practical process on a large scale are unknown. In this paper, we perform a life cycle assessment to quantify the potential environmental benefits of ethanol productionviaa proposed electrocatalytic captured CO2reduction (ECCR) system coupled with an innovative product separation design at a commercially relevant scale. The production of bioethanolviagrain fermentation was used as the reference in the comparison of nine environmental impact categories. Results indicate that ethanolviaECCR has a lower or comparable associated impact in all examined environmental categories, depending on the nature of the energy supplied to the system. Specifically for global warming, the ECCR becomes competitive against the reference when the electricity supplied has a carbon intensity lower than 63 gCO2eq per kW h. Overall, the proposed ECCR system is a modular and versatile alternative that presents a clear advantage on land use and water consumption. This early-stage technology has the capability of producing ethanol sustainably whilst offering the associated benefits of a carbon capture and utilisation pathway.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118991206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/d1se01462e
DO - 10.1039/d1se01462e
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118991206
VL - 5
SP - 5866
EP - 5880
JO - Sustainable Energy & Fuels
JF - Sustainable Energy & Fuels
SN - 2398-4902
IS - 22
ER -