How social capital influences community support for alternative water sources

Angela Jane Dean, Kelly Fielding, Joanne Maree Lindsay, Fiona Joy Newton, Helen Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Ensuring future water security requires broad community support for changes in policy, practice, and technology, such as those involved in delivering alternative water schemes. Building community support for alternative water sources may involve a suite of engagement activities, ranging from information campaigns, through to grassroots and participatory approaches. There is increasing recognition that ‘social capital’—the degree of social connectedness, trust, and shared values within a community—is important for building support for pro-environmental policies. However, little research has examined how social capital might influence support for alternative water schemes. We surveyed a representative sample of Australian adults (n = 5194). Support for alternative water sources was examined using a series of questions focusing on stormwater harvesting, desalination, and recycled water. Involvement in community organisations (defined as participation or membership) was used as an indicator of social capital. Using a series of mediation analyses, we identified that community involvement is associated with support for alternative water sources, and that this effect is mediated by (i) stronger water-related social norms, (ii) greater water-related knowledge, and (iii) increased recall of water-related information. Our results also suggest that these indirect effects can be conditional upon location, employment status, life satisfaction, and language spoken within the home. These findings highlight the importance of social capital in building engagement in water-related issues, and specifically, building support for alternative water sources. In addition they highlight potential pathways for the association between social capital and support for alternative water sources for different social groups and communities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-466
Number of pages10
JournalSustainable Cities and Society
Volume27
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jun 2016

Keywords

  • Alternative water sources
  • recycled water
  • social capital
  • community support
  • knowledge and information
  • social norms

Cite this

@article{002817a95fea4c12bc90960639beff5e,
title = "How social capital influences community support for alternative water sources",
abstract = "Ensuring future water security requires broad community support for changes in policy, practice, and technology, such as those involved in delivering alternative water schemes. Building community support for alternative water sources may involve a suite of engagement activities, ranging from information campaigns, through to grassroots and participatory approaches. There is increasing recognition that ‘social capital’—the degree of social connectedness, trust, and shared values within a community—is important for building support for pro-environmental policies. However, little research has examined how social capital might influence support for alternative water schemes. We surveyed a representative sample of Australian adults (n = 5194). Support for alternative water sources was examined using a series of questions focusing on stormwater harvesting, desalination, and recycled water. Involvement in community organisations (defined as participation or membership) was used as an indicator of social capital. Using a series of mediation analyses, we identified that community involvement is associated with support for alternative water sources, and that this effect is mediated by (i) stronger water-related social norms, (ii) greater water-related knowledge, and (iii) increased recall of water-related information. Our results also suggest that these indirect effects can be conditional upon location, employment status, life satisfaction, and language spoken within the home. These findings highlight the importance of social capital in building engagement in water-related issues, and specifically, building support for alternative water sources. In addition they highlight potential pathways for the association between social capital and support for alternative water sources for different social groups and communities.",
keywords = "Alternative water sources, recycled water, social capital, community support, knowledge and information, social norms",
author = "Dean, {Angela Jane} and Kelly Fielding and Lindsay, {Joanne Maree} and Newton, {Fiona Joy} and Helen Ross",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.016",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "457--466",
journal = "Sustainable Cities and Society",
issn = "2210-6707",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

How social capital influences community support for alternative water sources. / Dean, Angela Jane; Fielding, Kelly; Lindsay, Joanne Maree; Newton, Fiona Joy; Ross, Helen.

In: Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 27, 21.06.2016, p. 457-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How social capital influences community support for alternative water sources

AU - Dean, Angela Jane

AU - Fielding, Kelly

AU - Lindsay, Joanne Maree

AU - Newton, Fiona Joy

AU - Ross, Helen

PY - 2016/6/21

Y1 - 2016/6/21

N2 - Ensuring future water security requires broad community support for changes in policy, practice, and technology, such as those involved in delivering alternative water schemes. Building community support for alternative water sources may involve a suite of engagement activities, ranging from information campaigns, through to grassroots and participatory approaches. There is increasing recognition that ‘social capital’—the degree of social connectedness, trust, and shared values within a community—is important for building support for pro-environmental policies. However, little research has examined how social capital might influence support for alternative water schemes. We surveyed a representative sample of Australian adults (n = 5194). Support for alternative water sources was examined using a series of questions focusing on stormwater harvesting, desalination, and recycled water. Involvement in community organisations (defined as participation or membership) was used as an indicator of social capital. Using a series of mediation analyses, we identified that community involvement is associated with support for alternative water sources, and that this effect is mediated by (i) stronger water-related social norms, (ii) greater water-related knowledge, and (iii) increased recall of water-related information. Our results also suggest that these indirect effects can be conditional upon location, employment status, life satisfaction, and language spoken within the home. These findings highlight the importance of social capital in building engagement in water-related issues, and specifically, building support for alternative water sources. In addition they highlight potential pathways for the association between social capital and support for alternative water sources for different social groups and communities.

AB - Ensuring future water security requires broad community support for changes in policy, practice, and technology, such as those involved in delivering alternative water schemes. Building community support for alternative water sources may involve a suite of engagement activities, ranging from information campaigns, through to grassroots and participatory approaches. There is increasing recognition that ‘social capital’—the degree of social connectedness, trust, and shared values within a community—is important for building support for pro-environmental policies. However, little research has examined how social capital might influence support for alternative water schemes. We surveyed a representative sample of Australian adults (n = 5194). Support for alternative water sources was examined using a series of questions focusing on stormwater harvesting, desalination, and recycled water. Involvement in community organisations (defined as participation or membership) was used as an indicator of social capital. Using a series of mediation analyses, we identified that community involvement is associated with support for alternative water sources, and that this effect is mediated by (i) stronger water-related social norms, (ii) greater water-related knowledge, and (iii) increased recall of water-related information. Our results also suggest that these indirect effects can be conditional upon location, employment status, life satisfaction, and language spoken within the home. These findings highlight the importance of social capital in building engagement in water-related issues, and specifically, building support for alternative water sources. In addition they highlight potential pathways for the association between social capital and support for alternative water sources for different social groups and communities.

KW - Alternative water sources

KW - recycled water

KW - social capital

KW - community support

KW - knowledge and information

KW - social norms

U2 - 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.016

DO - 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.016

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 457

EP - 466

JO - Sustainable Cities and Society

JF - Sustainable Cities and Society

SN - 2210-6707

ER -