TY - JOUR
T1 - How midwives facilitate informed decisions in the third stage of labour – an exploration through portraiture
AU - Kloester, Joy
AU - Brand, Gabrielle
AU - Willey, Suzanne
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge Monash Nursing and Midwifery for providing a research development grant which has contributed to the dissemination of this research, as well as Helen Hall who contributed many hours and expert guidance in the early days of this project. The authors also wish to acknowledge the five generous and brilliant midwives who volunteered to be interviewed for this study. This project received a small research development grant from Monash University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Problem: Midwifery philosophy promotes informed decision-making. Despite this, midwives report a lack of informed decision-making in standard maternity care systems. Background: Previous research has shown a woman's ability to make informed decisions within her maternity care significantly impacts her childbearing experience. When informed decision-making is facilitated, women report positive experiences, whereas when lacking, there is an increased potential for birth trauma. Aim: To explore midwives’ experiences of facilitating informed decision-making, using third-stage management as context. Methods: Five midwives from Victoria, Australia, were interviewed about their experiences with informed decision-making. These interviews were guided by portraiture methodology whereby individual narrative portraits were created. This paper explores the shared themes among these five portraits. Findings: Five individual narrative portraits tell the stories of each midwife, providing rich insight into their philosophies, practices, barriers and enablers of informed decision-making. These are then examined as a whole dataset to explore shared themes, and include; ‘informed decision-making is fundamental to midwifery practice’ ‘the system’, and ‘navigating the system’. The system contained the sub-themes; hierarchy in hospitals, the medicalisation of birth, and the impact on midwifery practice, and ‘navigating the system’ – contained; safety of the woman and safety of the midwife, and the gold-standard of midwifery. Discussion and conclusion: Midwives in this study valued informed decision-making as fundamental to their philosophy but also faced barriers in their ability to facilitate it. Barriers to informed decision-making included: power-imbalances; de-skilling in physiological birth; fear of blame, and interdisciplinary disparities. Conversely enablers included continuity models of midwifery care, quality antenatal education, respectful interdisciplinary collaboration and an aim toward a resurgence of fundamental midwifery skills.
AB - Problem: Midwifery philosophy promotes informed decision-making. Despite this, midwives report a lack of informed decision-making in standard maternity care systems. Background: Previous research has shown a woman's ability to make informed decisions within her maternity care significantly impacts her childbearing experience. When informed decision-making is facilitated, women report positive experiences, whereas when lacking, there is an increased potential for birth trauma. Aim: To explore midwives’ experiences of facilitating informed decision-making, using third-stage management as context. Methods: Five midwives from Victoria, Australia, were interviewed about their experiences with informed decision-making. These interviews were guided by portraiture methodology whereby individual narrative portraits were created. This paper explores the shared themes among these five portraits. Findings: Five individual narrative portraits tell the stories of each midwife, providing rich insight into their philosophies, practices, barriers and enablers of informed decision-making. These are then examined as a whole dataset to explore shared themes, and include; ‘informed decision-making is fundamental to midwifery practice’ ‘the system’, and ‘navigating the system’. The system contained the sub-themes; hierarchy in hospitals, the medicalisation of birth, and the impact on midwifery practice, and ‘navigating the system’ – contained; safety of the woman and safety of the midwife, and the gold-standard of midwifery. Discussion and conclusion: Midwives in this study valued informed decision-making as fundamental to their philosophy but also faced barriers in their ability to facilitate it. Barriers to informed decision-making included: power-imbalances; de-skilling in physiological birth; fear of blame, and interdisciplinary disparities. Conversely enablers included continuity models of midwifery care, quality antenatal education, respectful interdisciplinary collaboration and an aim toward a resurgence of fundamental midwifery skills.
KW - Continuity of care
KW - Informed
KW - Interdisciplinary collaboration
KW - Narrative
KW - Qualitative
KW - Third-stage labour
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175535385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103868
DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103868
M3 - Article
C2 - 37931464
AN - SCOPUS:85175535385
SN - 0266-6138
VL - 127
JO - Midwifery
JF - Midwifery
M1 - 103868
ER -