How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography

Bill Palmer, Jonathon Thomas Stephen Lum, Jonathan Schlossberg, Alice Rose Gaby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the extent to which the way individuals describe spatial relationships correlates with features of the local landscape. Drawing on empirical data from two unrelated languages, Dhivehi (Indo-Aryan) and Marshallese (Austronesian), across a range of topographic environments, we examine the linguistic resources available to speakers, and spatial referential strategy preferences across languages and environments. We find that spatial language shows sensitivity to features of the topography, but this is mediated by the way speakers interact with the landscape. This leads us to propose a Sociotopographic Model, modelling the complex interplay of language structure, local environment, cultural practices, and language use, at odds with competing claims about the primacy of language or of environment in shaping spatial cognition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457–491
Number of pages35
JournalLinguistic Typology
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • spatial language
  • landscape
  • Cognition
  • Language and thought

Cite this

Palmer, Bill ; Lum, Jonathon Thomas Stephen ; Schlossberg, Jonathan ; Gaby, Alice Rose. / How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography. In: Linguistic Typology. 2017 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 457–491.
@article{42c022ee26184ef3878a3770198ad182,
title = "How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography",
abstract = "This paper investigates the extent to which the way individuals describe spatial relationships correlates with features of the local landscape. Drawing on empirical data from two unrelated languages, Dhivehi (Indo-Aryan) and Marshallese (Austronesian), across a range of topographic environments, we examine the linguistic resources available to speakers, and spatial referential strategy preferences across languages and environments. We find that spatial language shows sensitivity to features of the topography, but this is mediated by the way speakers interact with the landscape. This leads us to propose a Sociotopographic Model, modelling the complex interplay of language structure, local environment, cultural practices, and language use, at odds with competing claims about the primacy of language or of environment in shaping spatial cognition.",
keywords = "spatial language, landscape, Cognition, Language and thought",
author = "Bill Palmer and Lum, {Jonathon Thomas Stephen} and Jonathan Schlossberg and Gaby, {Alice Rose}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1515/lingty-2017-0011",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "457–491",
journal = "Linguistic Typology",
issn = "1430-0532",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter",
number = "3",

}

How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography. / Palmer, Bill; Lum, Jonathon Thomas Stephen; Schlossberg, Jonathan; Gaby, Alice Rose.

In: Linguistic Typology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2017, p. 457–491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography

AU - Palmer, Bill

AU - Lum, Jonathon Thomas Stephen

AU - Schlossberg, Jonathan

AU - Gaby, Alice Rose

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This paper investigates the extent to which the way individuals describe spatial relationships correlates with features of the local landscape. Drawing on empirical data from two unrelated languages, Dhivehi (Indo-Aryan) and Marshallese (Austronesian), across a range of topographic environments, we examine the linguistic resources available to speakers, and spatial referential strategy preferences across languages and environments. We find that spatial language shows sensitivity to features of the topography, but this is mediated by the way speakers interact with the landscape. This leads us to propose a Sociotopographic Model, modelling the complex interplay of language structure, local environment, cultural practices, and language use, at odds with competing claims about the primacy of language or of environment in shaping spatial cognition.

AB - This paper investigates the extent to which the way individuals describe spatial relationships correlates with features of the local landscape. Drawing on empirical data from two unrelated languages, Dhivehi (Indo-Aryan) and Marshallese (Austronesian), across a range of topographic environments, we examine the linguistic resources available to speakers, and spatial referential strategy preferences across languages and environments. We find that spatial language shows sensitivity to features of the topography, but this is mediated by the way speakers interact with the landscape. This leads us to propose a Sociotopographic Model, modelling the complex interplay of language structure, local environment, cultural practices, and language use, at odds with competing claims about the primacy of language or of environment in shaping spatial cognition.

KW - spatial language

KW - landscape

KW - Cognition

KW - Language and thought

U2 - 10.1515/lingty-2017-0011

DO - 10.1515/lingty-2017-0011

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 457

EP - 491

JO - Linguistic Typology

JF - Linguistic Typology

SN - 1430-0532

IS - 3

ER -