How do specimen preparation and crystal perfection affect structure factor measurements by quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The effectiveness of tripod polishing and crushing as methods of mechanically preparing transmission electron microscopy specimens of hard brittle inorganic crystalline materials is investigated via the example of cerium hexaboride (CeB6). It is shown that tripod polishing produces very large electron-transparent regions of very high crystal perfection compared to the more rapid technique of crushing, which produces crystallites with a high density of imperfections and significant mosaicity in the case studied here where the main crystallite facets are not along the natural {001} cleavage planes of CeB6. The role of specimen quality in limiting the accuracy of structure factor measurements by quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction (QCBED) is investigated. It is found that the bonding component of structure factors refined from CBED patterns obtained from crushed and tripod-polished specimens varies very significantly. It is shown that tripod-polished specimens yield CBED patterns of much greater integrity than crushed specimens and that the mismatch error that remains in QCBED pattern matching of data from tripod-polished specimens is essentially nonsystematic in nature. This stands in contrast to QCBED using crushed specimens and lends much greater confidence to the accuracy and precision of bonding measurements by QCBED from tripod-polished specimens.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)602-611
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Crystallography
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Keywords

  • bonding-sensitive structure factor measurements
  • QCBED
  • quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction
  • TEM
  • transmission electron microscopy
  • tripod polishing

Cite this

@article{f4d6c54738ab42aaa9c89341861b90ed,
title = "How do specimen preparation and crystal perfection affect structure factor measurements by quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction?",
abstract = "The effectiveness of tripod polishing and crushing as methods of mechanically preparing transmission electron microscopy specimens of hard brittle inorganic crystalline materials is investigated via the example of cerium hexaboride (CeB6). It is shown that tripod polishing produces very large electron-transparent regions of very high crystal perfection compared to the more rapid technique of crushing, which produces crystallites with a high density of imperfections and significant mosaicity in the case studied here where the main crystallite facets are not along the natural {001} cleavage planes of CeB6. The role of specimen quality in limiting the accuracy of structure factor measurements by quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction (QCBED) is investigated. It is found that the bonding component of structure factors refined from CBED patterns obtained from crushed and tripod-polished specimens varies very significantly. It is shown that tripod-polished specimens yield CBED patterns of much greater integrity than crushed specimens and that the mismatch error that remains in QCBED pattern matching of data from tripod-polished specimens is essentially nonsystematic in nature. This stands in contrast to QCBED using crushed specimens and lends much greater confidence to the accuracy and precision of bonding measurements by QCBED from tripod-polished specimens.",
keywords = "bonding-sensitive structure factor measurements, QCBED, quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction, TEM, transmission electron microscopy, tripod polishing",
author = "Ding Peng and Nakashima, {Philip N H}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1107/S1600576717003260",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "602--611",
journal = "Journal of Applied Crystallography",
issn = "0021-8898",
publisher = "International Union of Crystallography",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do specimen preparation and crystal perfection affect structure factor measurements by quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction?

AU - Peng, Ding

AU - Nakashima, Philip N H

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - The effectiveness of tripod polishing and crushing as methods of mechanically preparing transmission electron microscopy specimens of hard brittle inorganic crystalline materials is investigated via the example of cerium hexaboride (CeB6). It is shown that tripod polishing produces very large electron-transparent regions of very high crystal perfection compared to the more rapid technique of crushing, which produces crystallites with a high density of imperfections and significant mosaicity in the case studied here where the main crystallite facets are not along the natural {001} cleavage planes of CeB6. The role of specimen quality in limiting the accuracy of structure factor measurements by quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction (QCBED) is investigated. It is found that the bonding component of structure factors refined from CBED patterns obtained from crushed and tripod-polished specimens varies very significantly. It is shown that tripod-polished specimens yield CBED patterns of much greater integrity than crushed specimens and that the mismatch error that remains in QCBED pattern matching of data from tripod-polished specimens is essentially nonsystematic in nature. This stands in contrast to QCBED using crushed specimens and lends much greater confidence to the accuracy and precision of bonding measurements by QCBED from tripod-polished specimens.

AB - The effectiveness of tripod polishing and crushing as methods of mechanically preparing transmission electron microscopy specimens of hard brittle inorganic crystalline materials is investigated via the example of cerium hexaboride (CeB6). It is shown that tripod polishing produces very large electron-transparent regions of very high crystal perfection compared to the more rapid technique of crushing, which produces crystallites with a high density of imperfections and significant mosaicity in the case studied here where the main crystallite facets are not along the natural {001} cleavage planes of CeB6. The role of specimen quality in limiting the accuracy of structure factor measurements by quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction (QCBED) is investigated. It is found that the bonding component of structure factors refined from CBED patterns obtained from crushed and tripod-polished specimens varies very significantly. It is shown that tripod-polished specimens yield CBED patterns of much greater integrity than crushed specimens and that the mismatch error that remains in QCBED pattern matching of data from tripod-polished specimens is essentially nonsystematic in nature. This stands in contrast to QCBED using crushed specimens and lends much greater confidence to the accuracy and precision of bonding measurements by QCBED from tripod-polished specimens.

KW - bonding-sensitive structure factor measurements

KW - QCBED

KW - quantitative convergent-beam electron diffraction

KW - TEM

KW - transmission electron microscopy

KW - tripod polishing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017107689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1107/S1600576717003260

DO - 10.1107/S1600576717003260

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 602

EP - 611

JO - Journal of Applied Crystallography

JF - Journal of Applied Crystallography

SN - 0021-8898

IS - 2

ER -