Abstract
Background: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospective European multicenter study on traumatic brain injury (TBI), aiming to inform and stimulate initiatives to improve efficiency. Methods: We reviewed relevant documents regarding IRB submission and IRB approval from European neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI). Documents included detailed information on IRB procedures and the duration from IRB submission until approval(s). They were translated and analyzed to determine the level of harmonization of IRB procedures within Europe. Results: From 18 countries, 66 centers provided the requested documents. The primary IRB review was conducted centrally (N = 11, 61%) or locally (N = 7, 39%) and primary IRB approval was obtained after one (N = 8, 44%), two (N = 6, 33%) or three (N = 4, 23%) review rounds with a median duration of respectively 50 and 98 days until primary IRB approval. Additional IRB approval was required in 55% of countries and could increase duration to 535 days. Total duration from submission until required IRB approval was obtained was 114 days (IQR 75-224) and appeared to be shorter after submission to local IRBs compared to central IRBs (50 vs. 138 days, p = 0.0074). Conclusion: We found variation in IRB procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration. Research collaborations could benefit from the implementation of more uniform legislation and regulation while acknowledging local cultural habits and moral values between countries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 36 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | BMC Medical Ethics |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 12 May 2020 |
Keywords
- CENTER-TBI
- European Union
- Harmonization
- Health-care research
- Research ethic committees
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: BMC Medical Ethics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 36, 12.05.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review Article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
AU - Timmers, Marjolein
AU - Van Dijck, Jeroen T.J.M.
AU - Van Wijk, Roel P.J.
AU - Legrand, Valerie
AU - Van Veen, Ernest
AU - Maas, Andrew I.R.
AU - Menon, David K.
AU - Citerio, Giuseppe
AU - Stocchetti, Nino
AU - Kompanje, Erwin J.O.
AU - Åkerlund, Cecilia
AU - Amrein, Krisztina
AU - Andelic, Nada
AU - Andreassen, Lasse
AU - Anke, Audny
AU - Antoni, Anna
AU - Audibert, Gérard
AU - Azouvi, Philippe
AU - Azzolini, Maria Luisa
AU - Bartels, Ronald
AU - Barzó, Pál
AU - Beauvais, Romuald
AU - Beer, Ronny
AU - Bellander, Bo Michael
AU - Belli, Antonio
AU - Benali, Habib
AU - Berardino, Maurizio
AU - Beretta, Luigi
AU - Blaabjerg, Morten
AU - Bragge, Peter
AU - Brazinova, Alexandra
AU - Brinck, Vibeke
AU - Brooker, Joanne
AU - Brorsson, Camilla
AU - Buki, Andras
AU - Bullinger, Monika
AU - Cabeleira, Manuel
AU - Caccioppola, Alessio
AU - Calappi, Emiliana
AU - Calvi, Maria Rosa
AU - Cameron, Peter
AU - Lozano, Guillermo Carbayo
AU - Carbonara, Marco
AU - Cavallo, Simona
AU - Chevallard, Giorgio
AU - Chieregato, Arturo
AU - Ceyisakar, Iris
AU - Coburn, Mark
AU - Coles, Jonathan
AU - Cooper, Jamie D.
AU - Correia, Marta
AU - Čović, Amra
AU - Curry, Nicola
AU - Czeiter, Endre
AU - Czosnyka, Marek
AU - Dahyot-Fizelier, Claire
AU - Dark, Paul
AU - Dawes, Helen
AU - De Keyser, Véronique
AU - Degos, Vincent
AU - Corte, Francesco Della
AU - Den Boogert, Hugo
AU - Depreitere, Bart
AU - Crossed Signilvesi, Signula
AU - Dixit, Abhishek
AU - Donoghue, Emma
AU - Dreier, Jens
AU - Dulière, Guy Loup
AU - Ercole, Ari
AU - Esser, Patrick
AU - Ezer, Erzsébet
AU - Fabricius, Martin
AU - Feigin, Valery L.
AU - Foks, Kelly
AU - Frisvold, Shirin
AU - Furmanov, Alex
AU - Gagliardo, Pablo
AU - Galanaud, Damien
AU - Gantner, Dashiell
AU - Gao, Guoyi
AU - George, Pradeep
AU - Ghuysen, Alexandre
AU - Giga, Lelde
AU - Glocker, Ben
AU - Golubovic, Jagoš
AU - Gomez, Pedro A.
AU - Gratz, Johannes
AU - Gravesteijn, Benjamin
AU - Grossi, Francesca
AU - Gruen, Russell L.
AU - Gupta, Deepak
AU - Haagsma, Juanita A.
AU - Haitsma, Iain
AU - Helbok, Raimund
AU - Helseth, Eirik
AU - Horton, Lindsay
AU - Huijben, Jilske
AU - Hutchinson, Peter J.
AU - Jacobs, Bram
AU - Jankowski, Stefan
AU - Jarrett, Mike
AU - Jiang, Ji Yao
AU - Johnson, Faye
AU - Jones, Kelly
AU - Karan, Mladen
AU - Kolias, Angelos G.
AU - Kondziella, Daniel
AU - Koraropoulos, Evgenios
AU - Koskinen, Lars Owe
AU - Kovács, Noémi
AU - Kowark, Ana
AU - Lagares, Alfonso
AU - Lanyon, Linda
AU - Laureys, Steven
AU - Lecky, Fiona
AU - Ledoux, Didier
AU - Lefering, Rolf
AU - Lejeune, Aurelie
AU - Levi, Leon
AU - Lightfoot, Roger
AU - Lingsma, Hester
AU - Castanõ-León, Ana M.
AU - Maegele, Marc
AU - Majdan, Marek
AU - Manara, Alex
AU - Manley, Geoffrey
AU - Martino, Costanza
AU - Maréchal, Hugues
AU - Mattern, Julia
AU - McMahon, Catherine
AU - Melegh, Béla
AU - Menovsky, Tomas
AU - Misset, Benoit
AU - Mulazzi, Davide
AU - Muraleedharan, Visakh
AU - Murray, Lynnette
AU - Negru, Ancuta
AU - Nelson, David
AU - Newcombe, Virginia
AU - Nieboer, Daan
AU - Nyirádi, József
AU - Olubukola, Otesile
AU - Oresic, Matej
AU - Ortolano, Fabrizio
AU - Palotie, Aarno
AU - Parizel, Paul M.
AU - Payen, Jean François
AU - Perera, Natascha
AU - Perlbarg, Vincent
AU - Persona, Paolo
AU - Peul, Wilco
AU - Piippo-Karjalainen, Anna
AU - Pirinen, Matti
AU - Ples, Horia
AU - Polinder, Suzanne
AU - Pomposo, Inigo
AU - Posti, Jussi P.
AU - Puybasset, Louis
AU - Radoi, Andreea
AU - Ragauskas, Arminas
AU - Raj, Rahul
AU - Rambadagalla, Malinka
AU - Rhodes, Jonathan
AU - Richardson, Sylvia
AU - Richter, Sophie
AU - Ripatti, Samuli
AU - Rocka, Saulius
AU - Roe, Cecilie
AU - Roise, Olav
AU - Rosand, Jonathan
AU - Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.
AU - Rosenlund, Christina
AU - Rosenthal, Guy
AU - Rossaint, Rolf
AU - Rossi, Sandra
AU - Rueckert, Daniel
AU - Rusnák, Martin
AU - Sahuquillo, Juan
AU - Sakowitz, Oliver
AU - Sanchez-Porras, Renan
AU - Sandor, Janos
AU - Schäfer, Nadine
AU - Schmidt, Silke
AU - Schoechl, Herbert
AU - Schoonman, Guus
AU - Schou, Rico Frederik
AU - Schwendenwein, Elisabeth
AU - Sewalt, Charlie
AU - Skandsen, Toril
AU - Smielewski, Peter
AU - Sorinola, Abayomi
AU - Stamatakis, Emmanuel
AU - Stanworth, Simon
AU - Stevens, Robert
AU - Stewart, William
AU - Steyerberg, Ewout W.
AU - Sundström, Nina
AU - Synnot, Anneliese
AU - Takala, Riikka
AU - Tamás, Viktória
AU - Tamosuitis, Tomas
AU - Taylor, Mark Steven
AU - Ao, Braden Te
AU - Tenovuo, Olli
AU - Theadom, Alice
AU - Thomas, Matt
AU - Tibboel, Dick
AU - Tolias, Christos
AU - Trapani, Tony
AU - Tudora, Cristina Maria
AU - Vajkoczy, Peter
AU - Vallance, Shirley
AU - Valeinis, Egils
AU - Vámos, Zoltán
AU - Van Der Steen, Gregory
AU - Van Der Naalt, Joukje
AU - Van Essen, Thomas A.
AU - Van Hecke, Wim
AU - Van Heugten, Caroline
AU - Van Praag, Dominique
AU - Vyvere, Thijs Vande
AU - Vargiolu, Alessia
AU - Vega, Emmanuel
AU - Velt, Kimberley
AU - Verheyden, Jan
AU - Vespa, Paul M.
AU - Vik, Anne
AU - Vilcinis, Rimantas
AU - Volovici, Victor
AU - Von Steinbüchel, Nicole
AU - Voormolen, Daphne
AU - Vulekovic, Petar
AU - Wang, Kevin K.W.
AU - Wiegers, Eveline
AU - Williams, Guy
AU - Wilson, Lindsay
AU - Winzeck, Stefan
AU - Wolf, Stefan
AU - Yang, Zhihui
AU - Ylén, Peter
AU - Younsi, Alexander
AU - Zeiler, Frederick A.
AU - Zelinkova, Veronika
AU - Ziverte, Agate
AU - Zoerle, Tommaso
AU - the CENTER-TBI investigators and participants
PY - 2020/5/12
Y1 - 2020/5/12
N2 - Background: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospective European multicenter study on traumatic brain injury (TBI), aiming to inform and stimulate initiatives to improve efficiency. Methods: We reviewed relevant documents regarding IRB submission and IRB approval from European neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI). Documents included detailed information on IRB procedures and the duration from IRB submission until approval(s). They were translated and analyzed to determine the level of harmonization of IRB procedures within Europe. Results: From 18 countries, 66 centers provided the requested documents. The primary IRB review was conducted centrally (N = 11, 61%) or locally (N = 7, 39%) and primary IRB approval was obtained after one (N = 8, 44%), two (N = 6, 33%) or three (N = 4, 23%) review rounds with a median duration of respectively 50 and 98 days until primary IRB approval. Additional IRB approval was required in 55% of countries and could increase duration to 535 days. Total duration from submission until required IRB approval was obtained was 114 days (IQR 75-224) and appeared to be shorter after submission to local IRBs compared to central IRBs (50 vs. 138 days, p = 0.0074). Conclusion: We found variation in IRB procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration. Research collaborations could benefit from the implementation of more uniform legislation and regulation while acknowledging local cultural habits and moral values between countries.
AB - Background: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospective European multicenter study on traumatic brain injury (TBI), aiming to inform and stimulate initiatives to improve efficiency. Methods: We reviewed relevant documents regarding IRB submission and IRB approval from European neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI). Documents included detailed information on IRB procedures and the duration from IRB submission until approval(s). They were translated and analyzed to determine the level of harmonization of IRB procedures within Europe. Results: From 18 countries, 66 centers provided the requested documents. The primary IRB review was conducted centrally (N = 11, 61%) or locally (N = 7, 39%) and primary IRB approval was obtained after one (N = 8, 44%), two (N = 6, 33%) or three (N = 4, 23%) review rounds with a median duration of respectively 50 and 98 days until primary IRB approval. Additional IRB approval was required in 55% of countries and could increase duration to 535 days. Total duration from submission until required IRB approval was obtained was 114 days (IQR 75-224) and appeared to be shorter after submission to local IRBs compared to central IRBs (50 vs. 138 days, p = 0.0074). Conclusion: We found variation in IRB procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration. Research collaborations could benefit from the implementation of more uniform legislation and regulation while acknowledging local cultural habits and moral values between countries.
KW - CENTER-TBI
KW - European Union
KW - Harmonization
KW - Health-care research
KW - Research ethic committees
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084535573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8
DO - 10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 32398066
AN - SCOPUS:85084535573
SN - 1472-6939
VL - 21
JO - BMC Medical Ethics
JF - BMC Medical Ethics
IS - 1
M1 - 36
ER -