How development happens

Safe and sustainable energy, community development projects, and implementation challenges in timor-leste

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article describes how seed funding from one major Australian University, designed to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations among academics, led to the implementation of a safe and sustainable energy supply at a community development project in remote Timor-Leste. This article reflects on the process, the results, and insights developed during the project primarily from the point of view of the academics. A participatory process of co-design was virtually impossible to implement due to time and resource constraints that barely allowed genuine collaboration between academics. The consequent nurturing of a social relationship between partners across borders, which would have allowed a genuine process of co-design, was therefore not possible. Misunderstandings around the local context, tensions in understandings of timelines, and competing priorities all provided additional barriers to timely implementation of the development project. The final conclusion is that even with the best of intentions, if resource constraints do not allow the time and space to develop collaborative social relations and prioritize “process over product,” then genuine partnerships and participatory development have little chance of flourishing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-80
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of Anthropological Practice
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Cite this

@article{6ae0067d0e0e4e3082c5da77d9ba8a29,
title = "How development happens: Safe and sustainable energy, community development projects, and implementation challenges in timor-leste",
abstract = "This article describes how seed funding from one major Australian University, designed to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations among academics, led to the implementation of a safe and sustainable energy supply at a community development project in remote Timor-Leste. This article reflects on the process, the results, and insights developed during the project primarily from the point of view of the academics. A participatory process of co-design was virtually impossible to implement due to time and resource constraints that barely allowed genuine collaboration between academics. The consequent nurturing of a social relationship between partners across borders, which would have allowed a genuine process of co-design, was therefore not possible. Misunderstandings around the local context, tensions in understandings of timelines, and competing priorities all provided additional barriers to timely implementation of the development project. The final conclusion is that even with the best of intentions, if resource constraints do not allow the time and space to develop collaborative social relations and prioritize “process over product,” then genuine partnerships and participatory development have little chance of flourishing.",
author = "Niner, {Sara Louise} and Jotham Lay and Warren, {Narelle Louise} and Michael O'Connell and Daniel Edgington-Mitchell",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/napa.12121",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "68--80",
journal = "Annals of Anthropological Practice",
issn = "2153-957X",
number = "2",

}

How development happens : Safe and sustainable energy, community development projects, and implementation challenges in timor-leste. / Niner, Sara Louise; Lay, Jotham; Warren, Narelle Louise; O'Connell, Michael; Edgington-Mitchell, Daniel.

In: Annals of Anthropological Practice, Vol. 42, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 68-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How development happens

T2 - Safe and sustainable energy, community development projects, and implementation challenges in timor-leste

AU - Niner, Sara Louise

AU - Lay, Jotham

AU - Warren, Narelle Louise

AU - O'Connell, Michael

AU - Edgington-Mitchell, Daniel

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This article describes how seed funding from one major Australian University, designed to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations among academics, led to the implementation of a safe and sustainable energy supply at a community development project in remote Timor-Leste. This article reflects on the process, the results, and insights developed during the project primarily from the point of view of the academics. A participatory process of co-design was virtually impossible to implement due to time and resource constraints that barely allowed genuine collaboration between academics. The consequent nurturing of a social relationship between partners across borders, which would have allowed a genuine process of co-design, was therefore not possible. Misunderstandings around the local context, tensions in understandings of timelines, and competing priorities all provided additional barriers to timely implementation of the development project. The final conclusion is that even with the best of intentions, if resource constraints do not allow the time and space to develop collaborative social relations and prioritize “process over product,” then genuine partnerships and participatory development have little chance of flourishing.

AB - This article describes how seed funding from one major Australian University, designed to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations among academics, led to the implementation of a safe and sustainable energy supply at a community development project in remote Timor-Leste. This article reflects on the process, the results, and insights developed during the project primarily from the point of view of the academics. A participatory process of co-design was virtually impossible to implement due to time and resource constraints that barely allowed genuine collaboration between academics. The consequent nurturing of a social relationship between partners across borders, which would have allowed a genuine process of co-design, was therefore not possible. Misunderstandings around the local context, tensions in understandings of timelines, and competing priorities all provided additional barriers to timely implementation of the development project. The final conclusion is that even with the best of intentions, if resource constraints do not allow the time and space to develop collaborative social relations and prioritize “process over product,” then genuine partnerships and participatory development have little chance of flourishing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061205060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/napa.12121

DO - 10.1111/napa.12121

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 68

EP - 80

JO - Annals of Anthropological Practice

JF - Annals of Anthropological Practice

SN - 2153-957X

IS - 2

ER -