TY - JOUR
T1 - How accurate are manually prepared dose administration aids in residential aged care facilities?
AU - Hussainy, Safeera Yasmeen
AU - Marriott, Jennifer Lillian
AU - van Koeverden, Pia Maree
AU - Gilmartin, Julia Fiona-Maree
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background: Use of dose administration aids (DAAs) in Australian aged care facilities (ACFs) is common, having been adopted as a means of reducing medicine errors and increasing the efficiency of medicine administration. Aim: To audit a sample of manually prepared DAAs in an aged care setting and determine the rate of discrepancies between the contents of the DAA and the medicine chart. Method: A student researcher conducted audits at two ACFs. Incidents were documented and reported to nursing and pharmacy staff. In consultation with two academic pharmacists, incidents were categorised according to type, medicine class; potential medicine related problem; and whether they were actual errors. The primary outcome measure was the rate of errors per number of DAAs audited. Results: One hundred and sixty-six DAAs, containing 617 medicines, prepared for 91 residents were audited. Nineteen incidents were recorded, 18 of which were actual errors, which equates to a rate of 1 error per 5.1 patients, per 9.2 DAAs or per 34.3 medicines. Conclusion: The rate of errors (10.8 of DAAs) was higher than those observed previously, indicating a need for further investigation to confirm these results, determine possible causes for errors and develop methods to minimise their occurrence.
AB - Background: Use of dose administration aids (DAAs) in Australian aged care facilities (ACFs) is common, having been adopted as a means of reducing medicine errors and increasing the efficiency of medicine administration. Aim: To audit a sample of manually prepared DAAs in an aged care setting and determine the rate of discrepancies between the contents of the DAA and the medicine chart. Method: A student researcher conducted audits at two ACFs. Incidents were documented and reported to nursing and pharmacy staff. In consultation with two academic pharmacists, incidents were categorised according to type, medicine class; potential medicine related problem; and whether they were actual errors. The primary outcome measure was the rate of errors per number of DAAs audited. Results: One hundred and sixty-six DAAs, containing 617 medicines, prepared for 91 residents were audited. Nineteen incidents were recorded, 18 of which were actual errors, which equates to a rate of 1 error per 5.1 patients, per 9.2 DAAs or per 34.3 medicines. Conclusion: The rate of errors (10.8 of DAAs) was higher than those observed previously, indicating a need for further investigation to confirm these results, determine possible causes for errors and develop methods to minimise their occurrence.
UR - http://www.psa.org.au/download/ap/research/apapril12-research.pdf
M3 - Article
VL - 31
SP - 320
EP - 324
JO - Australian Pharmacist
JF - Australian Pharmacist
SN - 0728-4632
IS - 4
ER -