Households’ valuation of new broadband networks: the impact of the perceived benefits of and access to e-services

Dominic Thomas, Adam Finn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: While governments have invested in broadband infrastructure to ensure universal access, researchers argue that infrastructure alone does not guarantee internet use. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of one such government initiative on households’ internet adoption and use. Design/methodology/approach: The authors used data from 2002 to 2014, including two choice experiment surveys and broadband access and subscription data. Findings: The results of Survey 1 show that urban households valued existing e-services more than rural households, indicating the importance of government investment in broadband access. The results of Survey 2 show that when a publicly funded new broadband network equalized access costs, rural households valued overall e-services more than urban households, highlighting the dual role of access to e-services and their perceived benefits. Importantly, these results suggest that rural households resist social change, which lowers their valuation of certain new publicly funded e-services. Research limitations/implications: These findings extend the digital divide literature by providing empirical support for the applicability of the global village vs urban leadership framework in households’ valuations of e-services. Practical implications: While the government has worked diligently to enhance access, it also needs to focus on the types of content and services and better communication with communities. Originality/value: Recent research has focused on inequities in skills and usage, not internet access. Furthermore, the authors examined the inequality in benefits of access to meaningful e-services and better communication with beneficiaries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)675-695
Number of pages21
JournalInternet Research
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Choice experiments
  • Digital divide
  • E-government
  • E-services
  • Urban and rural differences
  • Value of non-market goods

Cite this

@article{e8bcbb97148b41669eab281b9969f8b8,
title = "Households’ valuation of new broadband networks: the impact of the perceived benefits of and access to e-services",
abstract = "Purpose: While governments have invested in broadband infrastructure to ensure universal access, researchers argue that infrastructure alone does not guarantee internet use. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of one such government initiative on households’ internet adoption and use. Design/methodology/approach: The authors used data from 2002 to 2014, including two choice experiment surveys and broadband access and subscription data. Findings: The results of Survey 1 show that urban households valued existing e-services more than rural households, indicating the importance of government investment in broadband access. The results of Survey 2 show that when a publicly funded new broadband network equalized access costs, rural households valued overall e-services more than urban households, highlighting the dual role of access to e-services and their perceived benefits. Importantly, these results suggest that rural households resist social change, which lowers their valuation of certain new publicly funded e-services. Research limitations/implications: These findings extend the digital divide literature by providing empirical support for the applicability of the global village vs urban leadership framework in households’ valuations of e-services. Practical implications: While the government has worked diligently to enhance access, it also needs to focus on the types of content and services and better communication with communities. Originality/value: Recent research has focused on inequities in skills and usage, not internet access. Furthermore, the authors examined the inequality in benefits of access to meaningful e-services and better communication with beneficiaries.",
keywords = "Choice experiments, Digital divide, E-government, E-services, Urban and rural differences, Value of non-market goods",
author = "Dominic Thomas and Adam Finn",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0317",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "675--695",
journal = "Internet Research",
issn = "1066-2243",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "3",

}

Households’ valuation of new broadband networks : the impact of the perceived benefits of and access to e-services. / Thomas, Dominic; Finn, Adam.

In: Internet Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 675-695.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Households’ valuation of new broadband networks

T2 - the impact of the perceived benefits of and access to e-services

AU - Thomas, Dominic

AU - Finn, Adam

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: While governments have invested in broadband infrastructure to ensure universal access, researchers argue that infrastructure alone does not guarantee internet use. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of one such government initiative on households’ internet adoption and use. Design/methodology/approach: The authors used data from 2002 to 2014, including two choice experiment surveys and broadband access and subscription data. Findings: The results of Survey 1 show that urban households valued existing e-services more than rural households, indicating the importance of government investment in broadband access. The results of Survey 2 show that when a publicly funded new broadband network equalized access costs, rural households valued overall e-services more than urban households, highlighting the dual role of access to e-services and their perceived benefits. Importantly, these results suggest that rural households resist social change, which lowers their valuation of certain new publicly funded e-services. Research limitations/implications: These findings extend the digital divide literature by providing empirical support for the applicability of the global village vs urban leadership framework in households’ valuations of e-services. Practical implications: While the government has worked diligently to enhance access, it also needs to focus on the types of content and services and better communication with communities. Originality/value: Recent research has focused on inequities in skills and usage, not internet access. Furthermore, the authors examined the inequality in benefits of access to meaningful e-services and better communication with beneficiaries.

AB - Purpose: While governments have invested in broadband infrastructure to ensure universal access, researchers argue that infrastructure alone does not guarantee internet use. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of one such government initiative on households’ internet adoption and use. Design/methodology/approach: The authors used data from 2002 to 2014, including two choice experiment surveys and broadband access and subscription data. Findings: The results of Survey 1 show that urban households valued existing e-services more than rural households, indicating the importance of government investment in broadband access. The results of Survey 2 show that when a publicly funded new broadband network equalized access costs, rural households valued overall e-services more than urban households, highlighting the dual role of access to e-services and their perceived benefits. Importantly, these results suggest that rural households resist social change, which lowers their valuation of certain new publicly funded e-services. Research limitations/implications: These findings extend the digital divide literature by providing empirical support for the applicability of the global village vs urban leadership framework in households’ valuations of e-services. Practical implications: While the government has worked diligently to enhance access, it also needs to focus on the types of content and services and better communication with communities. Originality/value: Recent research has focused on inequities in skills and usage, not internet access. Furthermore, the authors examined the inequality in benefits of access to meaningful e-services and better communication with beneficiaries.

KW - Choice experiments

KW - Digital divide

KW - E-government

KW - E-services

KW - Urban and rural differences

KW - Value of non-market goods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048012601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0317

DO - 10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0317

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 675

EP - 695

JO - Internet Research

JF - Internet Research

SN - 1066-2243

IS - 3

ER -