HOspitals and patients WoRking in Unity (HOW R U?): Telephone peer support to improve older patients' quality of life after emergency department discharge in Melbourne, Australia - A multicentre prospective feasibility study

Judy A. Lowthian, Alyse Lennox, Andrea Curtis, Gillian Wilson, Cate Rosewarne, De Villiers Smit, Debra O'Brien, Colette Joy Browning, Lee Boyd, Cathie Smith, Peter Cameron, Jeremy Dale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of the HOW R U? programme, a novel volunteer-peer postdischarge support programme for older patients after discharge from the emergency department (ED). Design: A multicentre prospective mixed-methods feasibility study. Setting: Two tertiary hospital EDs in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Participants: A convenience sample of 39 discharged ED patients aged 70 years or over, with symptoms of social isolation, loneliness and/or depression. Intervention: The HOW R U? intervention comprised weekly social support telephone calls delivered by volunteer peers for 3 months following ED discharge. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcomes were feasibility of study processes, intervention acceptability to participants and retention in the programme. Secondary outcomes: were changes in loneliness level (UCLA-3 - 3-item Loneliness Scale), mood (5-item Geriatric Depression Scale) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) postintervention. Results: Recruitment was feasible, with 30% of eligible patients successfully recruited. Seventeen volunteer peers provided telephone support to patient participants, in addition to their usual hospital volunteer role. HOW R U? was well received, with 87% retention in the patient group, and no attrition in the volunteer group. The median age of patients was 84 years, 64% were female, and 82% lived alone. Sixty-eight per cent of patients experienced reductions in depressive symptoms, and 53% experiencing reduced feelings of loneliness, and these differences were statistically significant Patient feedback was positive and volunteers reported great satisfaction with their new role. Conclusion HOW R U? was feasible in terms of recruitment and retention and was acceptable to both patients and volunteers. The overall results support the potential for further research in this area and provide data to support the design of a definitive trial to confirm the observed effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere020321
Number of pages6
JournalBMJ Open
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • gerontology
  • post-discharge
  • social isolation
  • telephone-support
  • volunteer-peer

Cite this

@article{05e32af4512f4654924211add7aaee7a,
title = "HOspitals and patients WoRking in Unity (HOW R U?): Telephone peer support to improve older patients' quality of life after emergency department discharge in Melbourne, Australia - A multicentre prospective feasibility study",
abstract = "Objectives: To ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of the HOW R U? programme, a novel volunteer-peer postdischarge support programme for older patients after discharge from the emergency department (ED). Design: A multicentre prospective mixed-methods feasibility study. Setting: Two tertiary hospital EDs in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Participants: A convenience sample of 39 discharged ED patients aged 70 years or over, with symptoms of social isolation, loneliness and/or depression. Intervention: The HOW R U? intervention comprised weekly social support telephone calls delivered by volunteer peers for 3 months following ED discharge. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcomes were feasibility of study processes, intervention acceptability to participants and retention in the programme. Secondary outcomes: were changes in loneliness level (UCLA-3 - 3-item Loneliness Scale), mood (5-item Geriatric Depression Scale) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) postintervention. Results: Recruitment was feasible, with 30{\%} of eligible patients successfully recruited. Seventeen volunteer peers provided telephone support to patient participants, in addition to their usual hospital volunteer role. HOW R U? was well received, with 87{\%} retention in the patient group, and no attrition in the volunteer group. The median age of patients was 84 years, 64{\%} were female, and 82{\%} lived alone. Sixty-eight per cent of patients experienced reductions in depressive symptoms, and 53{\%} experiencing reduced feelings of loneliness, and these differences were statistically significant Patient feedback was positive and volunteers reported great satisfaction with their new role. Conclusion HOW R U? was feasible in terms of recruitment and retention and was acceptable to both patients and volunteers. The overall results support the potential for further research in this area and provide data to support the design of a definitive trial to confirm the observed effects.",
keywords = "gerontology, post-discharge, social isolation, telephone-support, volunteer-peer",
author = "Lowthian, {Judy A.} and Alyse Lennox and Andrea Curtis and Gillian Wilson and Cate Rosewarne and Smit, {De Villiers} and Debra O'Brien and Browning, {Colette Joy} and Lee Boyd and Cathie Smith and Peter Cameron and Jeremy Dale",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020321",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

HOspitals and patients WoRking in Unity (HOW R U?) : Telephone peer support to improve older patients' quality of life after emergency department discharge in Melbourne, Australia - A multicentre prospective feasibility study. / Lowthian, Judy A.; Lennox, Alyse; Curtis, Andrea; Wilson, Gillian; Rosewarne, Cate; Smit, De Villiers; O'Brien, Debra; Browning, Colette Joy; Boyd, Lee; Smith, Cathie; Cameron, Peter; Dale, Jeremy.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 8, No. 6, e020321, 01.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - HOspitals and patients WoRking in Unity (HOW R U?)

T2 - Telephone peer support to improve older patients' quality of life after emergency department discharge in Melbourne, Australia - A multicentre prospective feasibility study

AU - Lowthian, Judy A.

AU - Lennox, Alyse

AU - Curtis, Andrea

AU - Wilson, Gillian

AU - Rosewarne, Cate

AU - Smit, De Villiers

AU - O'Brien, Debra

AU - Browning, Colette Joy

AU - Boyd, Lee

AU - Smith, Cathie

AU - Cameron, Peter

AU - Dale, Jeremy

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Objectives: To ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of the HOW R U? programme, a novel volunteer-peer postdischarge support programme for older patients after discharge from the emergency department (ED). Design: A multicentre prospective mixed-methods feasibility study. Setting: Two tertiary hospital EDs in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Participants: A convenience sample of 39 discharged ED patients aged 70 years or over, with symptoms of social isolation, loneliness and/or depression. Intervention: The HOW R U? intervention comprised weekly social support telephone calls delivered by volunteer peers for 3 months following ED discharge. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcomes were feasibility of study processes, intervention acceptability to participants and retention in the programme. Secondary outcomes: were changes in loneliness level (UCLA-3 - 3-item Loneliness Scale), mood (5-item Geriatric Depression Scale) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) postintervention. Results: Recruitment was feasible, with 30% of eligible patients successfully recruited. Seventeen volunteer peers provided telephone support to patient participants, in addition to their usual hospital volunteer role. HOW R U? was well received, with 87% retention in the patient group, and no attrition in the volunteer group. The median age of patients was 84 years, 64% were female, and 82% lived alone. Sixty-eight per cent of patients experienced reductions in depressive symptoms, and 53% experiencing reduced feelings of loneliness, and these differences were statistically significant Patient feedback was positive and volunteers reported great satisfaction with their new role. Conclusion HOW R U? was feasible in terms of recruitment and retention and was acceptable to both patients and volunteers. The overall results support the potential for further research in this area and provide data to support the design of a definitive trial to confirm the observed effects.

AB - Objectives: To ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of the HOW R U? programme, a novel volunteer-peer postdischarge support programme for older patients after discharge from the emergency department (ED). Design: A multicentre prospective mixed-methods feasibility study. Setting: Two tertiary hospital EDs in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Participants: A convenience sample of 39 discharged ED patients aged 70 years or over, with symptoms of social isolation, loneliness and/or depression. Intervention: The HOW R U? intervention comprised weekly social support telephone calls delivered by volunteer peers for 3 months following ED discharge. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcomes were feasibility of study processes, intervention acceptability to participants and retention in the programme. Secondary outcomes: were changes in loneliness level (UCLA-3 - 3-item Loneliness Scale), mood (5-item Geriatric Depression Scale) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) postintervention. Results: Recruitment was feasible, with 30% of eligible patients successfully recruited. Seventeen volunteer peers provided telephone support to patient participants, in addition to their usual hospital volunteer role. HOW R U? was well received, with 87% retention in the patient group, and no attrition in the volunteer group. The median age of patients was 84 years, 64% were female, and 82% lived alone. Sixty-eight per cent of patients experienced reductions in depressive symptoms, and 53% experiencing reduced feelings of loneliness, and these differences were statistically significant Patient feedback was positive and volunteers reported great satisfaction with their new role. Conclusion HOW R U? was feasible in terms of recruitment and retention and was acceptable to both patients and volunteers. The overall results support the potential for further research in this area and provide data to support the design of a definitive trial to confirm the observed effects.

KW - gerontology

KW - post-discharge

KW - social isolation

KW - telephone-support

KW - volunteer-peer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053165175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020321

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020321

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e020321

ER -