TY - JOUR
T1 - HOspitals and patients WoRking in Unity (HOW R U?)
T2 - Protocol for a prospective feasibility study of telephone peer support to improve older patients' quality of life after emergency department discharge
AU - Lowthian, Judy A.
AU - Lennox, Alyse
AU - Curtis, Andrea
AU - Dale, Jeremy
AU - Browning, Colette
AU - Smit, De Villiers
AU - Wilson, Gillian
AU - O'Brien, Debra
AU - Rosewarne, Cate
AU - Boyd, Lee
AU - Garner, Cath
AU - Cameron, Peter
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Introduction: Older people presenting to an emergency department (ED) have a higher likelihood of social isolation, loneliness and depression; which are all associated with negative health outcomes and increased health service use, including higher rates of ED attendance. The HOW R U? study aims to ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of a postdischarge telephone support programme for older ED patients following discharge. The intervention, which aims to improve quality of life, will be delivered by hospitalbased volunteers. Methods and analysis: A multicentre prospective uncontrolled feasibility study will enrol 50 communitydwelling patients aged ≥70 years with symptoms of loneliness or depression who are discharged home within 72 hours from the ED or acute medical ward. Participants will receive weekly supportive telephone calls over a 3-month period from a volunteerpeer. Feasibility will be assessed in terms of recruitment, acceptability of the intervention to participants and level of retention in the programme. Changes in level of loneliness (UCLA-3 item Loneliness Scale), mood (Geriatric Depression Scale-5 item) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and EQVAS) will also be measured postintervention (3 months). Ethics and dissemination: Research ethics and governance committee approval has been granted for this study by each participating centre (reference: 432/15 and 12-09-11-15). Study findings will inform the design and conduct of a future multicentre randomised controlled trial of a postdischarge volunteer-peer telephone support programme to improve social isolation, loneliness or depressive symptoms in older patients. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publication, and conference and seminar presentation.
AB - Introduction: Older people presenting to an emergency department (ED) have a higher likelihood of social isolation, loneliness and depression; which are all associated with negative health outcomes and increased health service use, including higher rates of ED attendance. The HOW R U? study aims to ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of a postdischarge telephone support programme for older ED patients following discharge. The intervention, which aims to improve quality of life, will be delivered by hospitalbased volunteers. Methods and analysis: A multicentre prospective uncontrolled feasibility study will enrol 50 communitydwelling patients aged ≥70 years with symptoms of loneliness or depression who are discharged home within 72 hours from the ED or acute medical ward. Participants will receive weekly supportive telephone calls over a 3-month period from a volunteerpeer. Feasibility will be assessed in terms of recruitment, acceptability of the intervention to participants and level of retention in the programme. Changes in level of loneliness (UCLA-3 item Loneliness Scale), mood (Geriatric Depression Scale-5 item) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and EQVAS) will also be measured postintervention (3 months). Ethics and dissemination: Research ethics and governance committee approval has been granted for this study by each participating centre (reference: 432/15 and 12-09-11-15). Study findings will inform the design and conduct of a future multicentre randomised controlled trial of a postdischarge volunteer-peer telephone support programme to improve social isolation, loneliness or depressive symptoms in older patients. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publication, and conference and seminar presentation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002271197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013179
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013179
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85002271197
VL - 6
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
SN - 2044-6055
IS - 12
M1 - e013179
ER -