Abstract
This article contrasts the flexibility of Chinese and Indian urban hospitals and the security of nurses. The study draws on a survey of 55 urban hospitals, and finds that national context generates different flexibility-security outcomes even when workers with similar skills are considered. Our findings support claims that China is constructing a flexibility-security regime that aims to promote both security and flexibility, and that India remains attached to employer-based social protection, but challenges the claim that economic growth is higher in China because India s employers have relatively less capacity to utilize labour-time as they wish.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 136 - 158 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | British Journal of Industrial Relations |
Volume | 53 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |