Hoarding disorder and the law

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While hoarding has been chronicled graphically by authors such as Dante, de Balzac, Dickens and Gogol, and has been the subject of sensationalist treatment by the media in respect of persons who are well known or who have become notorious, it has remained a subject of disparate clinical analysis, often subsumed under diagnoses of obsessive-compulsive conditions and concerns about old age squalor. It has been confused by ascriptions such as "Diogenes Syndrome", "Miss Havisham Syndrome", "Plyushkin Syndrome", "Syllogomania" and "Senile Squalor Syndrome", each of which is problematic or has significant limitations. Most commonly it has been correlated with both Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and schizophrenia but until the 2012 draft of DSM-V it has not been accorded the status of a disorder in its own right. However, with the likely elevation of its status by its inclusion as a stand-alone disorder in the DSM will come closer critical scrutiny, better clinical awareness, a fillip for further research, impetus for more effective treatment, and further exposure in the courts and tribunals. This editorial scrutinises the attention that hoarding of both articles and animals has already received in judicial and quasi-judicial decisions and identifies the many difficulties that it can pose for legal decision-making that is compassionate, rigorous and clinically informed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-249
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
Volume20
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Cite this

@article{660bc67dc94b42ada6fbf4563e59071d,
title = "Hoarding disorder and the law",
abstract = "While hoarding has been chronicled graphically by authors such as Dante, de Balzac, Dickens and Gogol, and has been the subject of sensationalist treatment by the media in respect of persons who are well known or who have become notorious, it has remained a subject of disparate clinical analysis, often subsumed under diagnoses of obsessive-compulsive conditions and concerns about old age squalor. It has been confused by ascriptions such as {"}Diogenes Syndrome{"}, {"}Miss Havisham Syndrome{"}, {"}Plyushkin Syndrome{"}, {"}Syllogomania{"} and {"}Senile Squalor Syndrome{"}, each of which is problematic or has significant limitations. Most commonly it has been correlated with both Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and schizophrenia but until the 2012 draft of DSM-V it has not been accorded the status of a disorder in its own right. However, with the likely elevation of its status by its inclusion as a stand-alone disorder in the DSM will come closer critical scrutiny, better clinical awareness, a fillip for further research, impetus for more effective treatment, and further exposure in the courts and tribunals. This editorial scrutinises the attention that hoarding of both articles and animals has already received in judicial and quasi-judicial decisions and identifies the many difficulties that it can pose for legal decision-making that is compassionate, rigorous and clinically informed.",
author = "Ian Freckelton",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "225--249",
journal = "Journal of Law and Medicine",
issn = "1320-159X",
publisher = "Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)",
number = "2",

}

Hoarding disorder and the law. / Freckelton, Ian.

In: Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 2, 12.2012, p. 225-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hoarding disorder and the law

AU - Freckelton, Ian

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - While hoarding has been chronicled graphically by authors such as Dante, de Balzac, Dickens and Gogol, and has been the subject of sensationalist treatment by the media in respect of persons who are well known or who have become notorious, it has remained a subject of disparate clinical analysis, often subsumed under diagnoses of obsessive-compulsive conditions and concerns about old age squalor. It has been confused by ascriptions such as "Diogenes Syndrome", "Miss Havisham Syndrome", "Plyushkin Syndrome", "Syllogomania" and "Senile Squalor Syndrome", each of which is problematic or has significant limitations. Most commonly it has been correlated with both Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and schizophrenia but until the 2012 draft of DSM-V it has not been accorded the status of a disorder in its own right. However, with the likely elevation of its status by its inclusion as a stand-alone disorder in the DSM will come closer critical scrutiny, better clinical awareness, a fillip for further research, impetus for more effective treatment, and further exposure in the courts and tribunals. This editorial scrutinises the attention that hoarding of both articles and animals has already received in judicial and quasi-judicial decisions and identifies the many difficulties that it can pose for legal decision-making that is compassionate, rigorous and clinically informed.

AB - While hoarding has been chronicled graphically by authors such as Dante, de Balzac, Dickens and Gogol, and has been the subject of sensationalist treatment by the media in respect of persons who are well known or who have become notorious, it has remained a subject of disparate clinical analysis, often subsumed under diagnoses of obsessive-compulsive conditions and concerns about old age squalor. It has been confused by ascriptions such as "Diogenes Syndrome", "Miss Havisham Syndrome", "Plyushkin Syndrome", "Syllogomania" and "Senile Squalor Syndrome", each of which is problematic or has significant limitations. Most commonly it has been correlated with both Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and schizophrenia but until the 2012 draft of DSM-V it has not been accorded the status of a disorder in its own right. However, with the likely elevation of its status by its inclusion as a stand-alone disorder in the DSM will come closer critical scrutiny, better clinical awareness, a fillip for further research, impetus for more effective treatment, and further exposure in the courts and tribunals. This editorial scrutinises the attention that hoarding of both articles and animals has already received in judicial and quasi-judicial decisions and identifies the many difficulties that it can pose for legal decision-making that is compassionate, rigorous and clinically informed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875903312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Editorial

VL - 20

SP - 225

EP - 249

JO - Journal of Law and Medicine

JF - Journal of Law and Medicine

SN - 1320-159X

IS - 2

ER -