HIV lipodystrophy in participants randomised to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) +2-3 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTI) or LPV/r + raltegravir as second-line antiretroviral therapy

Allison Martin, Cecilia L Moore, Patrick Mallon, Jennifer F Hoy, Sean Emery, Waldo H Belloso, Praphan Phanuphak, Samuel Ferret, David Cooper, Mark Boyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: To compare changes over 48 weeks in body fat, lipids, Metabolic Syndrome and cardiovascular disease risk between patients randomised 1:1 to lopinavir/ritonavir (r/LPV) plus raltegravir (RAL) compared to r/LPV plus 2?3 nucleoside/ nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTIs) as second-line therapy. Methods: Participants were HIV-1 positive (.16 years) failing first-line treatment (2 consecutive HIV RNA .500 copies/mL) of NNRTI +2N(t)RTI. Whole body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was performed at baseline and week 48. Data were obtained to calculate the Metabolic Syndrome and Framingham cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score. Linear regression was used to compare mean differences between arms. Logistic regression compared incidence of metabolic syndrome. Associations between percent limb fat changes at 48 weeks with baseline variables were assessed by backward stepwise multivariate linear regression. Analyses were adjusted for gender, body mass index and smoking status. Results: 210 participants were randomised. The mean (95 CI) increase in limb fat over 48 weeks was 15.7 (5.3, 25.9) or 0.9 kg (0.2, 1.5) in the r/LPV+N(t)RTI arm and 21.1 (11.1, 31,1) or 1.3 kg (0.7, 1.9) in the r/LPV+RAL arm, with no significant difference between treatment arms (25.4 [20.4 kg], p.0.1). Increases in total body fat mass (kg) and trunk fat mass (kg) were also similar between groups. Total:HDL cholesterol ratio was significantly higher in the RAL arm (mean difference 20.4 (1.4); p = 0.03), there were no other differences in lipid parameters between treatment arms. There were no statistically significant differences in CVD risk or incidence of Metabolic Syndrome between the two treatment arms. The baseline predictors of increased limb fat were high viral load, high insulin and participant?s not taking lipid lowering treatment. Conclusion: In patients switching to second line therapy, r/LPV combined with RAL demonstrated similar improvements in limb fat as an N(t)RTI + r/LPV regimen, but a worse total:HDL cholesterol ratio over 48 weeks. Trial Registration: This clinical trial is registered on, registry number NCT00931463 ct2/show/NCT00931463?term = NCT00931463 rank = 1.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere77138
Number of pages9
JournalPLoS ONE
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this