TY - JOUR
T1 - High-dose cytarabine (24g/m2) in combination with idarubicin (HiDAC-3) results in high first-cycle response with limited gastrointestinal toxicity in adult acute myeloid leukaemia
AU - Low, M
AU - Lee, D
AU - Coutsouvelis, John
AU - Patil, Sushrut
AU - Opat, Stephen
AU - Walker, Patricia Ann
AU - Schwarer, Anthony
AU - Salem, Hatem Hassan
AU - Avery, Sharon
AU - Spencer, Andrew
AU - Wei, Andrew
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Background/Aim: Although induction chemotherapy comprising high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) in combination with idarubicin and etoposide or ICE for adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) produces a complete remission rate of nearly 80 , gastrointestinal toxicity is significant. Omission of etoposide may produce similar clinical outcomes with potentially less gastrointestinal toxicity. Methods: Fifty-three consecutive patients aged 15-60 with newly diagnosed AML, receiving high-dose cytarabine induction at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, were retrospectively analysed. Regimens included HiDAC-3 (idarubicin 12mg/m2 day 1-3, cytarabine 3gm/m2 bd day 1,3,5,7) or ICE (idarubicin 9mg/m2 day 1-3, cytarabine 3g/m2 bd day 1,3,5,7, etoposide 75mg/m2 day 1-7). Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Results: Thirty-one patients received HIDAC-3 and 22 patients received ICE induction. HiDAC-3 was better tolerated than ICE in terms of lower frequency of grade 3-4 nausea (0 vs 41 ; P <0.01), grade 3-4 diarrhoea (26 vs 55 ; P = 0.05), lower rates of radiologically evident enterocolitis (6 vs 32 ; P = 0.03) and less cumulative days of total parenteral nutrition use (1.2 vs 7.3 days; P <0.01). Times to haematological recovery were similar between the two regimens. Thirty-day mortality was 0 for HiDAC-3 and 9 for ICE. Eighty-four per cent of HiDAC-3-treated patients achieved complete remission after the first cycle of therapy, compared with 77 with ICE. No differences in survival were evident between the two regimens. Conclusions: HiDAC-3 is a clinically effective induction regimen for adult AML, producing a high rate of first-cycle complete remission with less treatment-related gastrointestinal toxicity than ICE. ? 2012 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
AB - Background/Aim: Although induction chemotherapy comprising high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) in combination with idarubicin and etoposide or ICE for adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) produces a complete remission rate of nearly 80 , gastrointestinal toxicity is significant. Omission of etoposide may produce similar clinical outcomes with potentially less gastrointestinal toxicity. Methods: Fifty-three consecutive patients aged 15-60 with newly diagnosed AML, receiving high-dose cytarabine induction at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, were retrospectively analysed. Regimens included HiDAC-3 (idarubicin 12mg/m2 day 1-3, cytarabine 3gm/m2 bd day 1,3,5,7) or ICE (idarubicin 9mg/m2 day 1-3, cytarabine 3g/m2 bd day 1,3,5,7, etoposide 75mg/m2 day 1-7). Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Results: Thirty-one patients received HIDAC-3 and 22 patients received ICE induction. HiDAC-3 was better tolerated than ICE in terms of lower frequency of grade 3-4 nausea (0 vs 41 ; P <0.01), grade 3-4 diarrhoea (26 vs 55 ; P = 0.05), lower rates of radiologically evident enterocolitis (6 vs 32 ; P = 0.03) and less cumulative days of total parenteral nutrition use (1.2 vs 7.3 days; P <0.01). Times to haematological recovery were similar between the two regimens. Thirty-day mortality was 0 for HiDAC-3 and 9 for ICE. Eighty-four per cent of HiDAC-3-treated patients achieved complete remission after the first cycle of therapy, compared with 77 with ICE. No differences in survival were evident between the two regimens. Conclusions: HiDAC-3 is a clinically effective induction regimen for adult AML, producing a high rate of first-cycle complete remission with less treatment-related gastrointestinal toxicity than ICE. ? 2012 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02868.x/pdf
U2 - 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02868.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02868.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1444-0903
VL - 43
SP - 294
EP - 297
JO - Internal Medicine Journal
JF - Internal Medicine Journal
IS - 3
ER -