Hemodynamic management of septic shock

M. Lipcsey, M. Castegren, R. Bellomo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We present a review of the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Although substantial amount of evidence is present in this area, most key decisions on the management of these patients remain dependent on physiological reasoning and on pathophysiological principles rather than randomized controlled trials. During primary (early) resuscitation, restoration of adequate arterial pressure and cardiac output using fluids and vasopressor and/or inotropic drugs is guided by basic hemodynamic monitoring and physical examination in the emergency department. When more advanced level of monitoring is present in these patients, i.e. during secondary resuscitation (later phase in the emergency department and in the ICU), hemodynamic management can be guided by more advanced measurements of the macrocirculation. Our understanding of the microcirculation in septic shock is limited and reliable therapeutic modalities to optimize it do not yet exist. No specific hemodynamic treatment strategy, be it medications including fluids, monitoring devices or treatment algorithms has yet been proved to improve outcome. Moreover, there is virtually no data on the optimal management of the resolution phase of septic shock. Despite these gaps in knowledge, the data from observational studies and trials suggests that mortality in septic shock has been generally decreasing during the last decade.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1262-1272
Number of pages11
JournalMinerva Anestesiologica
Volume81
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2015

Keywords

  • Catecholamines
  • Fluid therapy
  • Hemodynamics
  • Septic
  • Shock
  • Vasoconstrictor agents

Cite this

Lipcsey, M., Castegren, M., & Bellomo, R. (2015). Hemodynamic management of septic shock. Minerva Anestesiologica, 81(11), 1262-1272.
Lipcsey, M. ; Castegren, M. ; Bellomo, R. / Hemodynamic management of septic shock. In: Minerva Anestesiologica. 2015 ; Vol. 81, No. 11. pp. 1262-1272.
@article{9cdc1677edc640f18a66fd6b32175385,
title = "Hemodynamic management of septic shock",
abstract = "We present a review of the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Although substantial amount of evidence is present in this area, most key decisions on the management of these patients remain dependent on physiological reasoning and on pathophysiological principles rather than randomized controlled trials. During primary (early) resuscitation, restoration of adequate arterial pressure and cardiac output using fluids and vasopressor and/or inotropic drugs is guided by basic hemodynamic monitoring and physical examination in the emergency department. When more advanced level of monitoring is present in these patients, i.e. during secondary resuscitation (later phase in the emergency department and in the ICU), hemodynamic management can be guided by more advanced measurements of the macrocirculation. Our understanding of the microcirculation in septic shock is limited and reliable therapeutic modalities to optimize it do not yet exist. No specific hemodynamic treatment strategy, be it medications including fluids, monitoring devices or treatment algorithms has yet been proved to improve outcome. Moreover, there is virtually no data on the optimal management of the resolution phase of septic shock. Despite these gaps in knowledge, the data from observational studies and trials suggests that mortality in septic shock has been generally decreasing during the last decade.",
keywords = "Catecholamines, Fluid therapy, Hemodynamics, Septic, Shock, Vasoconstrictor agents",
author = "M. Lipcsey and M. Castegren and R. Bellomo",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "1262--1272",
journal = "Minerva Anestesiologica",
issn = "0375-9393",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica",
number = "11",

}

Lipcsey, M, Castegren, M & Bellomo, R 2015, 'Hemodynamic management of septic shock' Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1262-1272.

Hemodynamic management of septic shock. / Lipcsey, M.; Castegren, M.; Bellomo, R.

In: Minerva Anestesiologica, Vol. 81, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 1262-1272.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hemodynamic management of septic shock

AU - Lipcsey, M.

AU - Castegren, M.

AU - Bellomo, R.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - We present a review of the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Although substantial amount of evidence is present in this area, most key decisions on the management of these patients remain dependent on physiological reasoning and on pathophysiological principles rather than randomized controlled trials. During primary (early) resuscitation, restoration of adequate arterial pressure and cardiac output using fluids and vasopressor and/or inotropic drugs is guided by basic hemodynamic monitoring and physical examination in the emergency department. When more advanced level of monitoring is present in these patients, i.e. during secondary resuscitation (later phase in the emergency department and in the ICU), hemodynamic management can be guided by more advanced measurements of the macrocirculation. Our understanding of the microcirculation in septic shock is limited and reliable therapeutic modalities to optimize it do not yet exist. No specific hemodynamic treatment strategy, be it medications including fluids, monitoring devices or treatment algorithms has yet been proved to improve outcome. Moreover, there is virtually no data on the optimal management of the resolution phase of septic shock. Despite these gaps in knowledge, the data from observational studies and trials suggests that mortality in septic shock has been generally decreasing during the last decade.

AB - We present a review of the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Although substantial amount of evidence is present in this area, most key decisions on the management of these patients remain dependent on physiological reasoning and on pathophysiological principles rather than randomized controlled trials. During primary (early) resuscitation, restoration of adequate arterial pressure and cardiac output using fluids and vasopressor and/or inotropic drugs is guided by basic hemodynamic monitoring and physical examination in the emergency department. When more advanced level of monitoring is present in these patients, i.e. during secondary resuscitation (later phase in the emergency department and in the ICU), hemodynamic management can be guided by more advanced measurements of the macrocirculation. Our understanding of the microcirculation in septic shock is limited and reliable therapeutic modalities to optimize it do not yet exist. No specific hemodynamic treatment strategy, be it medications including fluids, monitoring devices or treatment algorithms has yet been proved to improve outcome. Moreover, there is virtually no data on the optimal management of the resolution phase of septic shock. Despite these gaps in knowledge, the data from observational studies and trials suggests that mortality in septic shock has been generally decreasing during the last decade.

KW - Catecholamines

KW - Fluid therapy

KW - Hemodynamics

KW - Septic

KW - Shock

KW - Vasoconstrictor agents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947909402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review Article

VL - 81

SP - 1262

EP - 1272

JO - Minerva Anestesiologica

JF - Minerva Anestesiologica

SN - 0375-9393

IS - 11

ER -

Lipcsey M, Castegren M, Bellomo R. Hemodynamic management of septic shock. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2015 Nov 1;81(11):1262-1272.