Hedge funds: Replication and nonlinearities

Mikhail Tupitsyn, Paul Richard Lajbcygier

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Hedge funds were once considered to derive returns solely from managers superior skill for security selection and market timing as well as their ability to find and quickly exploit arbitrage opportunities in the market. Recently, researchers have challenged this view, as academic studies have revealed that a large part of hedge fund returns stems from systematic risk premiums rather than abnormal performance, or alpha. As a result of the revelation that an alternative beta exists and drives hedge fund returns, many researchers have been motivated to determine if hedge fund returns can be replicated inexpensively, similar to index fund replication such as Vanguard s S P 500 product. So far, researchers have proposed several approaches to replication. However, the task is still a work-in-progress in terms of successful implementation. Hedge funds dynamic investment strategies and flexibility to trade derivatives lead to complex nonlinear exposures to systematic risk, which existing linear models fail to capture. Until these nonlinear features are taken into account, any replication model is unlikely to succeed and evolve into a viable alternative to direct hedge fund investing. Therefore, this chapter introduces a new nonlinear model of hedge fund returns that paves the way toward nonlinear replication.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAlternative Investments: Instruments, Performance, Benchmarks, and Strategies
EditorsH Kent Baker, Greg Filbeck
Place of PublicationHoboken NJ USA
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
Pages541 - 566
Number of pages26
ISBN (Print)9781118241127
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

Tupitsyn, M., & Lajbcygier, P. R. (2013). Hedge funds: Replication and nonlinearities. In H. K. Baker, & G. Filbeck (Eds.), Alternative Investments: Instruments, Performance, Benchmarks, and Strategies (pp. 541 - 566). Hoboken NJ USA: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118656501.ch27
Tupitsyn, Mikhail ; Lajbcygier, Paul Richard. / Hedge funds: Replication and nonlinearities. Alternative Investments: Instruments, Performance, Benchmarks, and Strategies. editor / H Kent Baker ; Greg Filbeck. Hoboken NJ USA : John Wiley & Sons, 2013. pp. 541 - 566
@inbook{585326799c8b481d93571cd3062bf44b,
title = "Hedge funds: Replication and nonlinearities",
abstract = "Hedge funds were once considered to derive returns solely from managers superior skill for security selection and market timing as well as their ability to find and quickly exploit arbitrage opportunities in the market. Recently, researchers have challenged this view, as academic studies have revealed that a large part of hedge fund returns stems from systematic risk premiums rather than abnormal performance, or alpha. As a result of the revelation that an alternative beta exists and drives hedge fund returns, many researchers have been motivated to determine if hedge fund returns can be replicated inexpensively, similar to index fund replication such as Vanguard s S P 500 product. So far, researchers have proposed several approaches to replication. However, the task is still a work-in-progress in terms of successful implementation. Hedge funds dynamic investment strategies and flexibility to trade derivatives lead to complex nonlinear exposures to systematic risk, which existing linear models fail to capture. Until these nonlinear features are taken into account, any replication model is unlikely to succeed and evolve into a viable alternative to direct hedge fund investing. Therefore, this chapter introduces a new nonlinear model of hedge fund returns that paves the way toward nonlinear replication.",
author = "Mikhail Tupitsyn and Lajbcygier, {Paul Richard}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1002/9781118656501.ch27",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781118241127",
pages = "541 -- 566",
editor = "Baker, {H Kent} and Greg Filbeck",
booktitle = "Alternative Investments: Instruments, Performance, Benchmarks, and Strategies",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
address = "United States of America",

}

Tupitsyn, M & Lajbcygier, PR 2013, Hedge funds: Replication and nonlinearities. in HK Baker & G Filbeck (eds), Alternative Investments: Instruments, Performance, Benchmarks, and Strategies. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken NJ USA, pp. 541 - 566. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118656501.ch27

Hedge funds: Replication and nonlinearities. / Tupitsyn, Mikhail; Lajbcygier, Paul Richard.

Alternative Investments: Instruments, Performance, Benchmarks, and Strategies. ed. / H Kent Baker; Greg Filbeck. Hoboken NJ USA : John Wiley & Sons, 2013. p. 541 - 566.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Hedge funds: Replication and nonlinearities

AU - Tupitsyn, Mikhail

AU - Lajbcygier, Paul Richard

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Hedge funds were once considered to derive returns solely from managers superior skill for security selection and market timing as well as their ability to find and quickly exploit arbitrage opportunities in the market. Recently, researchers have challenged this view, as academic studies have revealed that a large part of hedge fund returns stems from systematic risk premiums rather than abnormal performance, or alpha. As a result of the revelation that an alternative beta exists and drives hedge fund returns, many researchers have been motivated to determine if hedge fund returns can be replicated inexpensively, similar to index fund replication such as Vanguard s S P 500 product. So far, researchers have proposed several approaches to replication. However, the task is still a work-in-progress in terms of successful implementation. Hedge funds dynamic investment strategies and flexibility to trade derivatives lead to complex nonlinear exposures to systematic risk, which existing linear models fail to capture. Until these nonlinear features are taken into account, any replication model is unlikely to succeed and evolve into a viable alternative to direct hedge fund investing. Therefore, this chapter introduces a new nonlinear model of hedge fund returns that paves the way toward nonlinear replication.

AB - Hedge funds were once considered to derive returns solely from managers superior skill for security selection and market timing as well as their ability to find and quickly exploit arbitrage opportunities in the market. Recently, researchers have challenged this view, as academic studies have revealed that a large part of hedge fund returns stems from systematic risk premiums rather than abnormal performance, or alpha. As a result of the revelation that an alternative beta exists and drives hedge fund returns, many researchers have been motivated to determine if hedge fund returns can be replicated inexpensively, similar to index fund replication such as Vanguard s S P 500 product. So far, researchers have proposed several approaches to replication. However, the task is still a work-in-progress in terms of successful implementation. Hedge funds dynamic investment strategies and flexibility to trade derivatives lead to complex nonlinear exposures to systematic risk, which existing linear models fail to capture. Until these nonlinear features are taken into account, any replication model is unlikely to succeed and evolve into a viable alternative to direct hedge fund investing. Therefore, this chapter introduces a new nonlinear model of hedge fund returns that paves the way toward nonlinear replication.

U2 - 10.1002/9781118656501.ch27

DO - 10.1002/9781118656501.ch27

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 9781118241127

SP - 541

EP - 566

BT - Alternative Investments: Instruments, Performance, Benchmarks, and Strategies

A2 - Baker, H Kent

A2 - Filbeck, Greg

PB - John Wiley & Sons

CY - Hoboken NJ USA

ER -

Tupitsyn M, Lajbcygier PR. Hedge funds: Replication and nonlinearities. In Baker HK, Filbeck G, editors, Alternative Investments: Instruments, Performance, Benchmarks, and Strategies. Hoboken NJ USA: John Wiley & Sons. 2013. p. 541 - 566 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118656501.ch27