Health professional students' rural placement satisfaction and rural practice intentions

A national cross-sectional survey

Tony Smith, Keith Sutton, Sabrina Pit, Kuda Muyambi, Daniel Terry, Annie Farthing, Claire Courtney, Merylin Cross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to profile students undertaking placements at University Departments of Rural Health (UDRHs) and investigate factors affecting students' satisfaction and intention to enter rural practice. Design: Cross-sectional survey comprising 21 core questions used by all UDRHs. Setting: Eleven UDRHs across Australia that support students' placements in regional, rural and remote locations. Participants: Medical, nursing and allied health students who participated in UDRH placements between July 2014 and November 2015 and completed the questionnaire. Main outcome measures: Key dependent variables were placement satisfaction and rural practice intention. Descriptive variables were age, gender, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) background, location of placement, healthcare discipline, year of study and type and length of placement. Results: A total of 3328 students responded. The sample was predominantly female (79%), the mean age was 26.0 years and 1.8% identified as ATSI. Most placements (69%) were >2 but ≤12 weeks, 80% were in Modified Monash 3, 4 or 5 geographical locations. Public hospitals and community health made up 63% of placements. Students satisfied with their placement had 2.33 higher odds of rural practice intention. Those satisfied with Indigenous cultural training, workplace supervision, access to education resources and accommodation had higher odds of overall satisfaction and post-placement rural practice intention. Conclusions: The majority of students were highly satisfied with their placement and the support provided by rural clinicians and the UDRHs. UDRHs are well placed to provide health professional students with highly satisfactory placements that foster rural practice intention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-32
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • health workforce
  • recruitment
  • retention
  • student placement

Cite this

Smith, Tony ; Sutton, Keith ; Pit, Sabrina ; Muyambi, Kuda ; Terry, Daniel ; Farthing, Annie ; Courtney, Claire ; Cross, Merylin. / Health professional students' rural placement satisfaction and rural practice intentions : A national cross-sectional survey. In: Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2018 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 26-32.
@article{5f8c906f7aa04b5cbac93faded83f243,
title = "Health professional students' rural placement satisfaction and rural practice intentions: A national cross-sectional survey",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to profile students undertaking placements at University Departments of Rural Health (UDRHs) and investigate factors affecting students' satisfaction and intention to enter rural practice. Design: Cross-sectional survey comprising 21 core questions used by all UDRHs. Setting: Eleven UDRHs across Australia that support students' placements in regional, rural and remote locations. Participants: Medical, nursing and allied health students who participated in UDRH placements between July 2014 and November 2015 and completed the questionnaire. Main outcome measures: Key dependent variables were placement satisfaction and rural practice intention. Descriptive variables were age, gender, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) background, location of placement, healthcare discipline, year of study and type and length of placement. Results: A total of 3328 students responded. The sample was predominantly female (79{\%}), the mean age was 26.0 years and 1.8{\%} identified as ATSI. Most placements (69{\%}) were >2 but ≤12 weeks, 80{\%} were in Modified Monash 3, 4 or 5 geographical locations. Public hospitals and community health made up 63{\%} of placements. Students satisfied with their placement had 2.33 higher odds of rural practice intention. Those satisfied with Indigenous cultural training, workplace supervision, access to education resources and accommodation had higher odds of overall satisfaction and post-placement rural practice intention. Conclusions: The majority of students were highly satisfied with their placement and the support provided by rural clinicians and the UDRHs. UDRHs are well placed to provide health professional students with highly satisfactory placements that foster rural practice intention.",
keywords = "health workforce, recruitment, retention, student placement",
author = "Tony Smith and Keith Sutton and Sabrina Pit and Kuda Muyambi and Daniel Terry and Annie Farthing and Claire Courtney and Merylin Cross",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ajr.12375",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "26--32",
journal = "Australian Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "1038-5282",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Health professional students' rural placement satisfaction and rural practice intentions : A national cross-sectional survey. / Smith, Tony; Sutton, Keith; Pit, Sabrina; Muyambi, Kuda; Terry, Daniel; Farthing, Annie; Courtney, Claire; Cross, Merylin.

In: Australian Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 26-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health professional students' rural placement satisfaction and rural practice intentions

T2 - A national cross-sectional survey

AU - Smith, Tony

AU - Sutton, Keith

AU - Pit, Sabrina

AU - Muyambi, Kuda

AU - Terry, Daniel

AU - Farthing, Annie

AU - Courtney, Claire

AU - Cross, Merylin

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to profile students undertaking placements at University Departments of Rural Health (UDRHs) and investigate factors affecting students' satisfaction and intention to enter rural practice. Design: Cross-sectional survey comprising 21 core questions used by all UDRHs. Setting: Eleven UDRHs across Australia that support students' placements in regional, rural and remote locations. Participants: Medical, nursing and allied health students who participated in UDRH placements between July 2014 and November 2015 and completed the questionnaire. Main outcome measures: Key dependent variables were placement satisfaction and rural practice intention. Descriptive variables were age, gender, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) background, location of placement, healthcare discipline, year of study and type and length of placement. Results: A total of 3328 students responded. The sample was predominantly female (79%), the mean age was 26.0 years and 1.8% identified as ATSI. Most placements (69%) were >2 but ≤12 weeks, 80% were in Modified Monash 3, 4 or 5 geographical locations. Public hospitals and community health made up 63% of placements. Students satisfied with their placement had 2.33 higher odds of rural practice intention. Those satisfied with Indigenous cultural training, workplace supervision, access to education resources and accommodation had higher odds of overall satisfaction and post-placement rural practice intention. Conclusions: The majority of students were highly satisfied with their placement and the support provided by rural clinicians and the UDRHs. UDRHs are well placed to provide health professional students with highly satisfactory placements that foster rural practice intention.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to profile students undertaking placements at University Departments of Rural Health (UDRHs) and investigate factors affecting students' satisfaction and intention to enter rural practice. Design: Cross-sectional survey comprising 21 core questions used by all UDRHs. Setting: Eleven UDRHs across Australia that support students' placements in regional, rural and remote locations. Participants: Medical, nursing and allied health students who participated in UDRH placements between July 2014 and November 2015 and completed the questionnaire. Main outcome measures: Key dependent variables were placement satisfaction and rural practice intention. Descriptive variables were age, gender, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) background, location of placement, healthcare discipline, year of study and type and length of placement. Results: A total of 3328 students responded. The sample was predominantly female (79%), the mean age was 26.0 years and 1.8% identified as ATSI. Most placements (69%) were >2 but ≤12 weeks, 80% were in Modified Monash 3, 4 or 5 geographical locations. Public hospitals and community health made up 63% of placements. Students satisfied with their placement had 2.33 higher odds of rural practice intention. Those satisfied with Indigenous cultural training, workplace supervision, access to education resources and accommodation had higher odds of overall satisfaction and post-placement rural practice intention. Conclusions: The majority of students were highly satisfied with their placement and the support provided by rural clinicians and the UDRHs. UDRHs are well placed to provide health professional students with highly satisfactory placements that foster rural practice intention.

KW - health workforce

KW - recruitment

KW - retention

KW - student placement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041288912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajr.12375

DO - 10.1111/ajr.12375

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 26

EP - 32

JO - Australian Journal of Rural Health

JF - Australian Journal of Rural Health

SN - 1038-5282

IS - 1

ER -