Head-to-Head Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of 3 Carer-Related Preference-Based Instruments

Nikki McCaffrey, Jessica Bucholc, Stacey Rand, Renske Hoefman, Anna Ugalde, Anne Muldowney, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Lidia Engel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the psychometric properties of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer), the Carer Experience Scale (CES), and the Care-related Quality of Life (CarerQol) to inform the choice of instrument in future studies. Methods: Data were derived from a 2018 online survey of informal carers in Australia. Reliability was assessed via internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) for respondents who self-reported no change in their quality of life as a carer over 2 weeks. Convergent validity was evaluated via predetermined hypotheses about associations (Spearman's rank correlation) with existing, validated measures. Discriminative validity was assessed based on the ability of the carer-related scores to distinguish between different informal care situations (Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance). Results: Data from 500 carers were analyzed. The ASCOT-Carer demonstrated a higher degree of internal consistency, possibly due to a unidimensional structure, and test-retest reliability than the CarerQol and CES (α = 0.87, 0.65, 0.59; ICC, 0.87, 0.67, 0.81, respectively). All 3 instruments exhibited convergent validity and detected statistically significant associations between carer-related scores and different informal care situations, except for the CarerQol-7D and sole carer status. Conclusions: The ASCOT-Carer, CarerQol, and CES performed reasonably well psychometrically; the ASCOT-Carer exhibited the best psychometric properties overall in this sample of Australian informal carers. Findings should be used in conjunction with consideration of research goals, carer population, targeted carer-related constructs, and prevailing perspectives on the economic evaluation to inform choice of instrument in future studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1477-1488
Number of pages12
JournalValue in Health
Volume23
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • carer-related quality of life
  • economic evaluation
  • informal care
  • outcome measurement
  • preference-based measures

Cite this