TY - JOUR
T1 - Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST)--sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
AU - Munoz-Venturelli, Paula
AU - Arima, Hisatomi
AU - Lavados, Pablo M
AU - Brunser, Alejandro M
AU - Peng, Bin
AU - Cui, Liying
AU - Song, Lily
AU - Billot, Laurent
AU - Boaden, Elizabeth L
AU - Hackett, Maree Lisa
AU - Heritier, Stephane Roland
AU - Jan, Stephen
AU - Middleton, Sandy
AU - Olavarria, Veronica V
AU - Lim, Joyce Y K
AU - Lindley, Richard I
AU - Heeley, Emma L
AU - Robinson, Thompson G
AU - Pontes-Neto, Octavio Marques
AU - Natsagdorj, Lkhamtsoo
AU - Lin, Ruey-Tay
AU - Watkins, Caroline L
AU - Anderson, Craig S
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: Positioning a patient lying-flat in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke may improve recovery and reduce
disability, but such a possibility has not been formally tested in a randomised trial. We therefore initiated the
Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) to determine the effects of lying-flat (0?) compared with sitting-up
(=30?) head positioning in the first 24 hours of hospital admission for patients with acute stroke.
Methods/Design: We plan to conduct an international, cluster randomised, crossover, open, blinded outcomeassessed
clinical trial involving 140 study hospitals (clusters) with established acute stroke care programs. Each
hospital will be randomly assigned to sequential policies of lying-flat (0?) or sitting-up (=30?) head position as a
`business as usual? stroke care policy during the first 24 hours of admittance. Each hospital is required to recruit
60 consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), and all patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage
(ICH) (an estimated average of 10), in the first randomised head position policy before crossing over to the second
head position policy with a similar recruitment target. After collection of in-hospital clinical and management data and
7-day outcomes, central trained blinded assessors will conduct a telephone disability assessment with the modified
Rankin Scale at 90 days. The primary outcome for analysis is a shift (defined as improvement) in death or disability
on this scale. For a cluster size of 60 patients with AIS per intervention and with various assumptions including an
intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.03, a sample size of 16,800 patients at 140 centres will provide 90 power
(a 0.05) to detect at least a 16 relative improvement (shift) in an ordinal logistic regression analysis of the primary
outcome. The treatment effect will also be assessed in all patients with ICH who are recruited during each treatment
study period.
Discussion: HeadPoST is a large international clinical trial in which we will rigorously evaluate the effects of different
head positioning in patients with acute stroke.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02162017 (date of registration: 27 April 2014); ANZCTR identifier:
ACTRN12614000483651 (date of registration: 9 May 2014). Protocol version and date: version 2.2, 19 June 2014.
AB - Background: Positioning a patient lying-flat in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke may improve recovery and reduce
disability, but such a possibility has not been formally tested in a randomised trial. We therefore initiated the
Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) to determine the effects of lying-flat (0?) compared with sitting-up
(=30?) head positioning in the first 24 hours of hospital admission for patients with acute stroke.
Methods/Design: We plan to conduct an international, cluster randomised, crossover, open, blinded outcomeassessed
clinical trial involving 140 study hospitals (clusters) with established acute stroke care programs. Each
hospital will be randomly assigned to sequential policies of lying-flat (0?) or sitting-up (=30?) head position as a
`business as usual? stroke care policy during the first 24 hours of admittance. Each hospital is required to recruit
60 consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), and all patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage
(ICH) (an estimated average of 10), in the first randomised head position policy before crossing over to the second
head position policy with a similar recruitment target. After collection of in-hospital clinical and management data and
7-day outcomes, central trained blinded assessors will conduct a telephone disability assessment with the modified
Rankin Scale at 90 days. The primary outcome for analysis is a shift (defined as improvement) in death or disability
on this scale. For a cluster size of 60 patients with AIS per intervention and with various assumptions including an
intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.03, a sample size of 16,800 patients at 140 centres will provide 90 power
(a 0.05) to detect at least a 16 relative improvement (shift) in an ordinal logistic regression analysis of the primary
outcome. The treatment effect will also be assessed in all patients with ICH who are recruited during each treatment
study period.
Discussion: HeadPoST is a large international clinical trial in which we will rigorously evaluate the effects of different
head positioning in patients with acute stroke.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02162017 (date of registration: 27 April 2014); ANZCTR identifier:
ACTRN12614000483651 (date of registration: 9 May 2014). Protocol version and date: version 2.2, 19 June 2014.
UR - http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/pdf/s13063-015-0767-1.pdf
U2 - 10.1186/s13063-015-0767-1
DO - 10.1186/s13063-015-0767-1
M3 - Article
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 16
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
IS - 1, Article No. 256
ER -