TY - JOUR
T1 - Haemodynamic and metabolic adaptations in coronary microvascular disease
AU - Noaman, Samer
AU - Kaye, David M.
AU - Nanayakkara, Shane
AU - Dart, Anthony M.
AU - Yong, Andy S.C.
AU - Ng, Martin
AU - Vizi, Donna
AU - Duffy, Stephen J.
AU - Cox, Nicholas
AU - Chan, William
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Harold and Cora Brennen Benevolent Trust and Abbott Vascular. Abbott Vascular provided the coronary guidewires used in the study but had no part in the design, data analysis, manuscript preparation or decision to publish this work. SN is supported by the Australian National Health Foundation (Health Professional Scholarship Award ID 102336) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence in Cardiovascular Outcome Improvement (CRECOI Scholarship).
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Objective: We aimed to evaluate the microcirculatory resistance (MR) and myocardial metabolic adaptations at rest and in response to increased cardiac workload in patients with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Methods: Patients with objective ischaemia and/or myocardial injury and non-obstructive coronary artery disease underwent thermodilution-derived microcirculatory assessment and transcardiac blood sampling during graded exercise with adenosine-mediated hyperaemia. We measured MR at rest and following supine cycle ergometry. Patients (n=24) were stratified by the resting index of MR (IMR) into normal-IMR (IMR<22U, n=12) and high-IMR groups (IMR≥22U, n=12). Results: The mean age was 57 years; 67% were males and 38% had hypertension. The normal-IMR group had increased IMR response to exercise (16±5 vs 23±12U, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group, who had persistently elevated IMR at rest and following exercise (38±19 vs 33±15U, p=0.39) despite similar exercise duration and rate-pressure product between the groups, both p>0.05. The normal-IMR group had augmented oxygen extraction ratio following exercise (53±18 vs 64±11%, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group (65±14 vs 59±11%, p=0.26). The postexercise lactate uptake was greater in the high-IMR (0.04±0.05 vs 0.11±0.07 mmol/L, p=0.004) compared with normal-IMR group (0.08±0.06 vs 0.09±0.09 mmol/L, p=0.67). The high-IMR group demonstrated greater troponin release following exercise compared with the normal-IMR group (0.13±0.12 vs 0.001±0.05 ng/L, p=0.03). Conclusions: Patients with suspected CMD appear to have distinctive microcirculatory resistive and myocardial metabolic profiles at rest and in response to exercise. These differences in phenotypes may permit individualised therapies targeting microvascular responsiveness (normal-IMR group) and/or myocardial metabolic adaptations (normal-IMR and high-IMR groups).
AB - Objective: We aimed to evaluate the microcirculatory resistance (MR) and myocardial metabolic adaptations at rest and in response to increased cardiac workload in patients with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Methods: Patients with objective ischaemia and/or myocardial injury and non-obstructive coronary artery disease underwent thermodilution-derived microcirculatory assessment and transcardiac blood sampling during graded exercise with adenosine-mediated hyperaemia. We measured MR at rest and following supine cycle ergometry. Patients (n=24) were stratified by the resting index of MR (IMR) into normal-IMR (IMR<22U, n=12) and high-IMR groups (IMR≥22U, n=12). Results: The mean age was 57 years; 67% were males and 38% had hypertension. The normal-IMR group had increased IMR response to exercise (16±5 vs 23±12U, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group, who had persistently elevated IMR at rest and following exercise (38±19 vs 33±15U, p=0.39) despite similar exercise duration and rate-pressure product between the groups, both p>0.05. The normal-IMR group had augmented oxygen extraction ratio following exercise (53±18 vs 64±11%, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group (65±14 vs 59±11%, p=0.26). The postexercise lactate uptake was greater in the high-IMR (0.04±0.05 vs 0.11±0.07 mmol/L, p=0.004) compared with normal-IMR group (0.08±0.06 vs 0.09±0.09 mmol/L, p=0.67). The high-IMR group demonstrated greater troponin release following exercise compared with the normal-IMR group (0.13±0.12 vs 0.001±0.05 ng/L, p=0.03). Conclusions: Patients with suspected CMD appear to have distinctive microcirculatory resistive and myocardial metabolic profiles at rest and in response to exercise. These differences in phenotypes may permit individualised therapies targeting microvascular responsiveness (normal-IMR group) and/or myocardial metabolic adaptations (normal-IMR and high-IMR groups).
KW - Acute Coronary Syndrome
KW - Angina Pectoris
KW - Coronary Angiography
KW - Microvascular Angina
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85152392563
U2 - 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-322156
DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-322156
M3 - Article
C2 - 36931716
AN - SCOPUS:85152392563
SN - 1355-6037
VL - 109
SP - 1166
EP - 1174
JO - Heart
JF - Heart
IS - 15
ER -