Guidewire retention following central venous catheterisation: A human factors and safe design investigation

Tim Horberry, Yi Chun Teng, James Ward, Vishal Patil, P. John Clarkson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central Venous Catheterisation (CVC) has occasionally been associated with cases of retained guidewires in patients after surgery. In theory, this is a completely avoidable complication; however, as with any human procedure, operator error leading to guidewires being occasionally retained cannot be fully eliminated. OBJECTIVE: The work described here investigated the issue in an attempt to better understand it both from an operator and a systems perspective, and to ultimately recommend appropriate safe design solutions that reduce guidewire retention errors. METHODS: Nine distinct methods were used: observations of the procedure, a literature review, interviewing CVC end-users, task analysis construction, CVC procedural audits, two human reliability assessments, usability heuristics and a comprehensive solution survey with CVC end-users. RESULTS: The three solutions that operators rated most highly, in terms of both practicality and effectiveness, were: making trainees better aware of the potential guidewire complications and strongly emphasising guidewire removal in CVC training, actively checking that the guidewire is present in the waste tray for disposal, and standardising purchase of central line sets so that differences that may affect chances of guidewire loss is minimised. CONCLUSIONS: Further work to eliminate/engineer out the possibility of guidewires being retained is proposed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-37
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Central venous catheterisation
  • guidewire
  • human factors
  • patient safety
  • safe design

Cite this