Group interventions to promote mental health in health professional education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Kristin Lo, Jamie Waterland, Paula Todd, Tanvi Gupta, Margaret Bearman, Craig Hassed, Jennifer L. Keating

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Effects of interventions for improving mental health of health professional students has not been established. This review analysed interventions to support mental health of health professional students and their effects. The full holdings of Medline, PsycINFO, EBM Reviews, Cinahl Plus, ERIC and EMBASE were searched until 15th April 2016. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of undergraduate and post graduate health professional students, group interventions to support mental health compared to alternative education, usual curriculum or no intervention; and post-intervention measurements for intervention and control participants of mindfulness, anxiety, depression, stress/distress or burnout. Studies were limited to English and short term effects. Studies were appraised using the PEDro scale. Data were synthesised using meta-analysis. Four comparisons were identified: psychoeducation or cognitive-behavioural interventions compared to alternative education, and mindfulness or relaxation compared to control conditions. Cognitive-behavioural interventions reduced anxiety (−0.26; −0.5 to −0.02), depression (−0.29; −0.52 to −0.05) and stress (0.37; −0.61 to −0.13). Mindfulness strategies reduced stress (−0.60; −0.97 to −0.22) but not anxiety (95% CI −0.21 to 0.18), depression (95% CI −0.36 to 0.03) or burnout (95% CI −0.36 to 0.10). Relaxation strategies reduced anxiety (SMD −0.80; 95% CI −1.03 to −0.58), depression (−0.49; −0.88 to −0.11) and stress (−0.34; −0.67 to −0.01). Method quality was generally poor. Evidence suggests that cognitive-behavioural, relaxation and mindfulness interventions may support health professional student mental health. Further high quality research is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-447
Number of pages35
JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Keywords

  • Cognitive-behavioural
  • Health professional student
  • Mental health
  • Meta-analysis
  • Mindfulness
  • Psychoeducation
  • Relaxation
  • Systematic review

Cite this

@article{0f3f19ad23cb41a198e994e34c7e3bcd,
title = "Group interventions to promote mental health in health professional education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials",
abstract = "Effects of interventions for improving mental health of health professional students has not been established. This review analysed interventions to support mental health of health professional students and their effects. The full holdings of Medline, PsycINFO, EBM Reviews, Cinahl Plus, ERIC and EMBASE were searched until 15th April 2016. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of undergraduate and post graduate health professional students, group interventions to support mental health compared to alternative education, usual curriculum or no intervention; and post-intervention measurements for intervention and control participants of mindfulness, anxiety, depression, stress/distress or burnout. Studies were limited to English and short term effects. Studies were appraised using the PEDro scale. Data were synthesised using meta-analysis. Four comparisons were identified: psychoeducation or cognitive-behavioural interventions compared to alternative education, and mindfulness or relaxation compared to control conditions. Cognitive-behavioural interventions reduced anxiety (−0.26; −0.5 to −0.02), depression (−0.29; −0.52 to −0.05) and stress (0.37; −0.61 to −0.13). Mindfulness strategies reduced stress (−0.60; −0.97 to −0.22) but not anxiety (95{\%} CI −0.21 to 0.18), depression (95{\%} CI −0.36 to 0.03) or burnout (95{\%} CI −0.36 to 0.10). Relaxation strategies reduced anxiety (SMD −0.80; 95{\%} CI −1.03 to −0.58), depression (−0.49; −0.88 to −0.11) and stress (−0.34; −0.67 to −0.01). Method quality was generally poor. Evidence suggests that cognitive-behavioural, relaxation and mindfulness interventions may support health professional student mental health. Further high quality research is warranted.",
keywords = "Cognitive-behavioural, Health professional student, Mental health, Meta-analysis, Mindfulness, Psychoeducation, Relaxation, Systematic review",
author = "Kristin Lo and Jamie Waterland and Paula Todd and Tanvi Gupta and Margaret Bearman and Craig Hassed and Keating, {Jennifer L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10459-017-9770-5",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "413--447",
journal = "Advances in Health Sciences Education",
issn = "1382-4996",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

Group interventions to promote mental health in health professional education : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. / Lo, Kristin; Waterland, Jamie; Todd, Paula; Gupta, Tanvi; Bearman, Margaret; Hassed, Craig; Keating, Jennifer L.

In: Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 23, No. 2, 05.2018, p. 413-447.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group interventions to promote mental health in health professional education

T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

AU - Lo, Kristin

AU - Waterland, Jamie

AU - Todd, Paula

AU - Gupta, Tanvi

AU - Bearman, Margaret

AU - Hassed, Craig

AU - Keating, Jennifer L.

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - Effects of interventions for improving mental health of health professional students has not been established. This review analysed interventions to support mental health of health professional students and their effects. The full holdings of Medline, PsycINFO, EBM Reviews, Cinahl Plus, ERIC and EMBASE were searched until 15th April 2016. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of undergraduate and post graduate health professional students, group interventions to support mental health compared to alternative education, usual curriculum or no intervention; and post-intervention measurements for intervention and control participants of mindfulness, anxiety, depression, stress/distress or burnout. Studies were limited to English and short term effects. Studies were appraised using the PEDro scale. Data were synthesised using meta-analysis. Four comparisons were identified: psychoeducation or cognitive-behavioural interventions compared to alternative education, and mindfulness or relaxation compared to control conditions. Cognitive-behavioural interventions reduced anxiety (−0.26; −0.5 to −0.02), depression (−0.29; −0.52 to −0.05) and stress (0.37; −0.61 to −0.13). Mindfulness strategies reduced stress (−0.60; −0.97 to −0.22) but not anxiety (95% CI −0.21 to 0.18), depression (95% CI −0.36 to 0.03) or burnout (95% CI −0.36 to 0.10). Relaxation strategies reduced anxiety (SMD −0.80; 95% CI −1.03 to −0.58), depression (−0.49; −0.88 to −0.11) and stress (−0.34; −0.67 to −0.01). Method quality was generally poor. Evidence suggests that cognitive-behavioural, relaxation and mindfulness interventions may support health professional student mental health. Further high quality research is warranted.

AB - Effects of interventions for improving mental health of health professional students has not been established. This review analysed interventions to support mental health of health professional students and their effects. The full holdings of Medline, PsycINFO, EBM Reviews, Cinahl Plus, ERIC and EMBASE were searched until 15th April 2016. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of undergraduate and post graduate health professional students, group interventions to support mental health compared to alternative education, usual curriculum or no intervention; and post-intervention measurements for intervention and control participants of mindfulness, anxiety, depression, stress/distress or burnout. Studies were limited to English and short term effects. Studies were appraised using the PEDro scale. Data were synthesised using meta-analysis. Four comparisons were identified: psychoeducation or cognitive-behavioural interventions compared to alternative education, and mindfulness or relaxation compared to control conditions. Cognitive-behavioural interventions reduced anxiety (−0.26; −0.5 to −0.02), depression (−0.29; −0.52 to −0.05) and stress (0.37; −0.61 to −0.13). Mindfulness strategies reduced stress (−0.60; −0.97 to −0.22) but not anxiety (95% CI −0.21 to 0.18), depression (95% CI −0.36 to 0.03) or burnout (95% CI −0.36 to 0.10). Relaxation strategies reduced anxiety (SMD −0.80; 95% CI −1.03 to −0.58), depression (−0.49; −0.88 to −0.11) and stress (−0.34; −0.67 to −0.01). Method quality was generally poor. Evidence suggests that cognitive-behavioural, relaxation and mindfulness interventions may support health professional student mental health. Further high quality research is warranted.

KW - Cognitive-behavioural

KW - Health professional student

KW - Mental health

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Mindfulness

KW - Psychoeducation

KW - Relaxation

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015212613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10459-017-9770-5

DO - 10.1007/s10459-017-9770-5

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 413

EP - 447

JO - Advances in Health Sciences Education

JF - Advances in Health Sciences Education

SN - 1382-4996

IS - 2

ER -