GPs’ insights into prostate cancer diagnosis and care in regional Victoria, Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this research was to ascertain General Practitioners’ (GPs) perceptions and experiences of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, treatment, and care in metropolitan Melbourne and in a regional area of Victoria, Australia, associated with poorer PCa outcomes. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs (N= 10) practising in the selected region and in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. GPs thought that most men wanted PSA testing and were willing to undergo rectal examination. Some GPs were troubled by inconsistent screening guidelines from different professional bodies. They identified a need for resources to support them in educating patients about PCa. GPs thought it might be more difficult for young female GPs to care for patients in relation to PCa screening; differences were evident between younger female GPs and older male GPs in the approach they adopted in interviews. Regional GPs often referred patients to services in larger centres because no local specialists were available. GPs also found it hard to explain differences in PCa outcomes in regional and metropolitan areas. Potential age and gender differences in GPs in relation to prostate care warrant further examination. Although GPs were able to offer only limited insights into the poorer outcomes in regional areas, they identified ways in which they could be assisted to provide best-practice care. Multidisciplinary care, resources for patients, and consistent guidelines for the detection and treatment of PCa should contribute to better care in all areas.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11
Pages (from-to)2365-2379
Number of pages15
JournalThe Qualitative Report
Volume21
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 22 Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Care
  • Diagnosis
  • General practitioners
  • Prostate cancer
  • Qualitative research
  • Regional
  • Screening

Cite this

@article{85083b8c68f44ca8931488c09112bdec,
title = "GPs’ insights into prostate cancer diagnosis and care in regional Victoria, Australia",
abstract = "The aim of this research was to ascertain General Practitioners’ (GPs) perceptions and experiences of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, treatment, and care in metropolitan Melbourne and in a regional area of Victoria, Australia, associated with poorer PCa outcomes. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs (N= 10) practising in the selected region and in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. GPs thought that most men wanted PSA testing and were willing to undergo rectal examination. Some GPs were troubled by inconsistent screening guidelines from different professional bodies. They identified a need for resources to support them in educating patients about PCa. GPs thought it might be more difficult for young female GPs to care for patients in relation to PCa screening; differences were evident between younger female GPs and older male GPs in the approach they adopted in interviews. Regional GPs often referred patients to services in larger centres because no local specialists were available. GPs also found it hard to explain differences in PCa outcomes in regional and metropolitan areas. Potential age and gender differences in GPs in relation to prostate care warrant further examination. Although GPs were able to offer only limited insights into the poorer outcomes in regional areas, they identified ways in which they could be assisted to provide best-practice care. Multidisciplinary care, resources for patients, and consistent guidelines for the detection and treatment of PCa should contribute to better care in all areas.",
keywords = "Care, Diagnosis, General practitioners, Prostate cancer, Qualitative research, Regional, Screening",
author = "Rasa Ruseckaite and Sue Evans and Jeremy Millar and Sara Holton and Danielle Mazza and Jane Fisher and Maggie Kirkman",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "22",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "2365--2379",
journal = "The Qualitative Report",
issn = "1052-0147",
publisher = "Nova Southeastern University",
number = "12",

}

GPs’ insights into prostate cancer diagnosis and care in regional Victoria, Australia. / Ruseckaite, Rasa; Evans, Sue; Millar, Jeremy; Holton, Sara; Mazza, Danielle; Fisher, Jane; Kirkman, Maggie.

In: The Qualitative Report, Vol. 21, No. 12, 11, 22.12.2016, p. 2365-2379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - GPs’ insights into prostate cancer diagnosis and care in regional Victoria, Australia

AU - Ruseckaite, Rasa

AU - Evans, Sue

AU - Millar, Jeremy

AU - Holton, Sara

AU - Mazza, Danielle

AU - Fisher, Jane

AU - Kirkman, Maggie

PY - 2016/12/22

Y1 - 2016/12/22

N2 - The aim of this research was to ascertain General Practitioners’ (GPs) perceptions and experiences of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, treatment, and care in metropolitan Melbourne and in a regional area of Victoria, Australia, associated with poorer PCa outcomes. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs (N= 10) practising in the selected region and in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. GPs thought that most men wanted PSA testing and were willing to undergo rectal examination. Some GPs were troubled by inconsistent screening guidelines from different professional bodies. They identified a need for resources to support them in educating patients about PCa. GPs thought it might be more difficult for young female GPs to care for patients in relation to PCa screening; differences were evident between younger female GPs and older male GPs in the approach they adopted in interviews. Regional GPs often referred patients to services in larger centres because no local specialists were available. GPs also found it hard to explain differences in PCa outcomes in regional and metropolitan areas. Potential age and gender differences in GPs in relation to prostate care warrant further examination. Although GPs were able to offer only limited insights into the poorer outcomes in regional areas, they identified ways in which they could be assisted to provide best-practice care. Multidisciplinary care, resources for patients, and consistent guidelines for the detection and treatment of PCa should contribute to better care in all areas.

AB - The aim of this research was to ascertain General Practitioners’ (GPs) perceptions and experiences of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, treatment, and care in metropolitan Melbourne and in a regional area of Victoria, Australia, associated with poorer PCa outcomes. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs (N= 10) practising in the selected region and in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. GPs thought that most men wanted PSA testing and were willing to undergo rectal examination. Some GPs were troubled by inconsistent screening guidelines from different professional bodies. They identified a need for resources to support them in educating patients about PCa. GPs thought it might be more difficult for young female GPs to care for patients in relation to PCa screening; differences were evident between younger female GPs and older male GPs in the approach they adopted in interviews. Regional GPs often referred patients to services in larger centres because no local specialists were available. GPs also found it hard to explain differences in PCa outcomes in regional and metropolitan areas. Potential age and gender differences in GPs in relation to prostate care warrant further examination. Although GPs were able to offer only limited insights into the poorer outcomes in regional areas, they identified ways in which they could be assisted to provide best-practice care. Multidisciplinary care, resources for patients, and consistent guidelines for the detection and treatment of PCa should contribute to better care in all areas.

KW - Care

KW - Diagnosis

KW - General practitioners

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Regional

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007492124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 2365

EP - 2379

JO - The Qualitative Report

JF - The Qualitative Report

SN - 1052-0147

IS - 12

M1 - 11

ER -