Glyn Humphreys

Attention, Binding, Motion-Induced Blindness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Glyn Humphreys' research on attention and binding began from feature-integration theory, which claims that binding together visual features, such as colour and orientation, requires spatially selective attention. Humphreys employed a more inclusive notion of binding and argued, on neuropsychological grounds, for a multi-stage account of the overall binding process, in which binding together of form elements was followed by two stages of feature binding. Only the second stage of feature binding, a re-entrant (top-down) process beginning in posterior parietal cortex and returning to early visual areas, required attention. In line with his commitment to converging evidence, Humphreys considered that investigating the role of attention in motion-induced blindness could be a route to better understanding of the cognitive role of the attention-dependent second stage of feature binding. He suggested that this role might be to resolve ambiguity and to generate a single consistent interpretation of the perceptual input.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-154
Number of pages28
JournalMind and Language
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{0a7c3f7f7b834e6c829af53b94453d0c,
title = "Glyn Humphreys: Attention, Binding, Motion-Induced Blindness",
abstract = "Glyn Humphreys' research on attention and binding began from feature-integration theory, which claims that binding together visual features, such as colour and orientation, requires spatially selective attention. Humphreys employed a more inclusive notion of binding and argued, on neuropsychological grounds, for a multi-stage account of the overall binding process, in which binding together of form elements was followed by two stages of feature binding. Only the second stage of feature binding, a re-entrant (top-down) process beginning in posterior parietal cortex and returning to early visual areas, required attention. In line with his commitment to converging evidence, Humphreys considered that investigating the role of attention in motion-induced blindness could be a route to better understanding of the cognitive role of the attention-dependent second stage of feature binding. He suggested that this role might be to resolve ambiguity and to generate a single consistent interpretation of the perceptual input.",
author = "Martin Davies",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/mila.12136",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "127--154",
journal = "Mind and Language",
issn = "0268-1064",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Glyn Humphreys : Attention, Binding, Motion-Induced Blindness. / Davies, Martin.

In: Mind and Language, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2017, p. 127-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glyn Humphreys

T2 - Attention, Binding, Motion-Induced Blindness

AU - Davies, Martin

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Glyn Humphreys' research on attention and binding began from feature-integration theory, which claims that binding together visual features, such as colour and orientation, requires spatially selective attention. Humphreys employed a more inclusive notion of binding and argued, on neuropsychological grounds, for a multi-stage account of the overall binding process, in which binding together of form elements was followed by two stages of feature binding. Only the second stage of feature binding, a re-entrant (top-down) process beginning in posterior parietal cortex and returning to early visual areas, required attention. In line with his commitment to converging evidence, Humphreys considered that investigating the role of attention in motion-induced blindness could be a route to better understanding of the cognitive role of the attention-dependent second stage of feature binding. He suggested that this role might be to resolve ambiguity and to generate a single consistent interpretation of the perceptual input.

AB - Glyn Humphreys' research on attention and binding began from feature-integration theory, which claims that binding together visual features, such as colour and orientation, requires spatially selective attention. Humphreys employed a more inclusive notion of binding and argued, on neuropsychological grounds, for a multi-stage account of the overall binding process, in which binding together of form elements was followed by two stages of feature binding. Only the second stage of feature binding, a re-entrant (top-down) process beginning in posterior parietal cortex and returning to early visual areas, required attention. In line with his commitment to converging evidence, Humphreys considered that investigating the role of attention in motion-induced blindness could be a route to better understanding of the cognitive role of the attention-dependent second stage of feature binding. He suggested that this role might be to resolve ambiguity and to generate a single consistent interpretation of the perceptual input.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016744231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/mila.12136

DO - 10.1111/mila.12136

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 127

EP - 154

JO - Mind and Language

JF - Mind and Language

SN - 0268-1064

IS - 2

ER -