Glycaemic control of Type 2 diabetes in older patients visiting general practitioners

An examination of electronic medical records to identify risk factors for poor control

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To investigate factors associated with glycaemic control of diabetes in older patients in the general practice setting in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Method: This retrospective study used the data from 10,257 patients aged ≥ 65 years with Type 2 diabetes from the Melbourne East Monash General Practice Database (MAGNET), 2009–2014. Poor glycaemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥ 9.0%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association between risk factors and glycaemic control. Results: Of the total 10,257 patients, 6819 (66.5%) had their HbA1c recorded within a period of 2 years prior to their last GP visit. Between 4% and 6% had HbA1c level ≥ 9.0%. Robust predictors of poor glycaemic control were found to be decreasing age group (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65–0.90) and prescribed insulin (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 2.41–3.32). Conclusion: One third of older patients with Type 2 diabetes did not have HbA1c recorded in the previous 2 years, despite clinical guidelines recommending at least annual testing. Many older patients had good glycaemic control, however the findings indicate that those aged 65–74 and those prescribed insulin may require special care and management to achieve this.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-132
Number of pages8
JournalDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume153
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jun 2019

Cite this

@article{6cce81dbf97c4b81b20715015867fe43,
title = "Glycaemic control of Type 2 diabetes in older patients visiting general practitioners: An examination of electronic medical records to identify risk factors for poor control",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate factors associated with glycaemic control of diabetes in older patients in the general practice setting in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Method: This retrospective study used the data from 10,257 patients aged ≥ 65 years with Type 2 diabetes from the Melbourne East Monash General Practice Database (MAGNET), 2009–2014. Poor glycaemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥ 9.0{\%}. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association between risk factors and glycaemic control. Results: Of the total 10,257 patients, 6819 (66.5{\%}) had their HbA1c recorded within a period of 2 years prior to their last GP visit. Between 4{\%} and 6{\%} had HbA1c level ≥ 9.0{\%}. Robust predictors of poor glycaemic control were found to be decreasing age group (OR = 0.77, 95{\%} CI: 0.65–0.90) and prescribed insulin (OR = 2.83, 95{\%} CI: 2.41–3.32). Conclusion: One third of older patients with Type 2 diabetes did not have HbA1c recorded in the previous 2 years, despite clinical guidelines recommending at least annual testing. Many older patients had good glycaemic control, however the findings indicate that those aged 65–74 and those prescribed insulin may require special care and management to achieve this.",
author = "Ting Xia and Lyle Turner and Joanne Enticott and Danielle Mazza and Peter Schattner",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.diabres.2019.06.004",
language = "English",
volume = "153",
pages = "125--132",
journal = "Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice",
issn = "0168-8227",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glycaemic control of Type 2 diabetes in older patients visiting general practitioners

T2 - An examination of electronic medical records to identify risk factors for poor control

AU - Xia, Ting

AU - Turner, Lyle

AU - Enticott, Joanne

AU - Mazza, Danielle

AU - Schattner, Peter

PY - 2019/6/11

Y1 - 2019/6/11

N2 - Objective: To investigate factors associated with glycaemic control of diabetes in older patients in the general practice setting in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Method: This retrospective study used the data from 10,257 patients aged ≥ 65 years with Type 2 diabetes from the Melbourne East Monash General Practice Database (MAGNET), 2009–2014. Poor glycaemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥ 9.0%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association between risk factors and glycaemic control. Results: Of the total 10,257 patients, 6819 (66.5%) had their HbA1c recorded within a period of 2 years prior to their last GP visit. Between 4% and 6% had HbA1c level ≥ 9.0%. Robust predictors of poor glycaemic control were found to be decreasing age group (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65–0.90) and prescribed insulin (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 2.41–3.32). Conclusion: One third of older patients with Type 2 diabetes did not have HbA1c recorded in the previous 2 years, despite clinical guidelines recommending at least annual testing. Many older patients had good glycaemic control, however the findings indicate that those aged 65–74 and those prescribed insulin may require special care and management to achieve this.

AB - Objective: To investigate factors associated with glycaemic control of diabetes in older patients in the general practice setting in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Method: This retrospective study used the data from 10,257 patients aged ≥ 65 years with Type 2 diabetes from the Melbourne East Monash General Practice Database (MAGNET), 2009–2014. Poor glycaemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥ 9.0%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association between risk factors and glycaemic control. Results: Of the total 10,257 patients, 6819 (66.5%) had their HbA1c recorded within a period of 2 years prior to their last GP visit. Between 4% and 6% had HbA1c level ≥ 9.0%. Robust predictors of poor glycaemic control were found to be decreasing age group (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65–0.90) and prescribed insulin (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 2.41–3.32). Conclusion: One third of older patients with Type 2 diabetes did not have HbA1c recorded in the previous 2 years, despite clinical guidelines recommending at least annual testing. Many older patients had good glycaemic control, however the findings indicate that those aged 65–74 and those prescribed insulin may require special care and management to achieve this.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067394353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.06.004

M3 - Article

VL - 153

SP - 125

EP - 132

JO - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

JF - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

SN - 0168-8227

ER -