Global health and emergency care: a resuscitation research agenda - Part 2

Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Tom Aufderheide, Graham Nichol, Bentley Bobrow, Leo Bossaert, Peter Cameron, Judith C Finn, Ian G Jacobs, Rudolph Koster, Bryan McNally, Yih Yng Ng, Sang Do Shin, George Sopko, Hideharu Tanaka, Taku Iwami, Mark Hauswald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At the 2013 Academic Emergency Medicine global health consensus conference, a breakout session to develop a research agenda for resuscitation was held. Two articles are the result of that discussion. This second article addresses data collection, management, and analysis and regionalization of postresuscitation care, resuscitation programs, and research examples around the world and proposes a strategy to strengthen resuscitation research globally. There is a need for reliable global statistics on resuscitation, international standardization of data, and development of an electronic standard for reporting data. Regionalization of postresuscitation care is a priority area for future research. Large resuscitation clinical research networks are feasible and can give valuable data for improvement of service and outcomes. Low-cost models of population-based research, and emphasis on interventional and implementation studies that assess the clinical effects of programs and interventions, are needed to determine the most cost-effective strategies to improve outcomes. The global challenge is how to adapt research findings to a developing world situation to have an effect internationally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1297 - 1303
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this