Giving versus taking for a cause

Philip Johnson Grossman, Catherine Eckel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study focuses on subjects willingness to give to and take from a charity. We implement a real donation Dictator Game with initial endowments allocated in one of two ways: all to the subjects or all to the charity. Subjects are allowed to redistribute the endowments as they wish. We find that the initial allocation is irrelevant; final donations to the charities are nearly identical, in sharp contrast to similar research with an anonymous student recipient. Our findings imply that such framing no longer matters when a charity is substituted for an anonymous individual in the dictator setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28 - 30
Number of pages3
JournalEconomics Letters
Volume132
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

Grossman, Philip Johnson ; Eckel, Catherine. / Giving versus taking for a cause. In: Economics Letters. 2015 ; Vol. 132. pp. 28 - 30.
@article{884a4707775e46aea0c47c502b81b521,
title = "Giving versus taking for a cause",
abstract = "This study focuses on subjects willingness to give to and take from a charity. We implement a real donation Dictator Game with initial endowments allocated in one of two ways: all to the subjects or all to the charity. Subjects are allowed to redistribute the endowments as they wish. We find that the initial allocation is irrelevant; final donations to the charities are nearly identical, in sharp contrast to similar research with an anonymous student recipient. Our findings imply that such framing no longer matters when a charity is substituted for an anonymous individual in the dictator setting.",
author = "Grossman, {Philip Johnson} and Catherine Eckel",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.002",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "28 -- 30",
journal = "Economics Letters",
issn = "0165-1765",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Giving versus taking for a cause. / Grossman, Philip Johnson; Eckel, Catherine.

In: Economics Letters, Vol. 132, 2015, p. 28 - 30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giving versus taking for a cause

AU - Grossman, Philip Johnson

AU - Eckel, Catherine

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study focuses on subjects willingness to give to and take from a charity. We implement a real donation Dictator Game with initial endowments allocated in one of two ways: all to the subjects or all to the charity. Subjects are allowed to redistribute the endowments as they wish. We find that the initial allocation is irrelevant; final donations to the charities are nearly identical, in sharp contrast to similar research with an anonymous student recipient. Our findings imply that such framing no longer matters when a charity is substituted for an anonymous individual in the dictator setting.

AB - This study focuses on subjects willingness to give to and take from a charity. We implement a real donation Dictator Game with initial endowments allocated in one of two ways: all to the subjects or all to the charity. Subjects are allowed to redistribute the endowments as they wish. We find that the initial allocation is irrelevant; final donations to the charities are nearly identical, in sharp contrast to similar research with an anonymous student recipient. Our findings imply that such framing no longer matters when a charity is substituted for an anonymous individual in the dictator setting.

U2 - 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.002

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 28

EP - 30

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

SN - 0165-1765

ER -