Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The significance of context to the proper interpretation of texts has been known for millennia; it is implicit in some of Aristotle’s recommendations in Rhetoric and Quintilian’s in Institutes that rhetoric should ideally be appropriate to what was, post Augustine, called its context. Malinowski wrote that a stick may be used for different purposes in different contexts, e.g. digging, punting, walking, fighting. Exactly the same is true of language expressions, e.g. a word which is an insult in one context may be an expression of camaraderie or endearment in another (and vice versa). Stalnaker’s claim ‘context [is] a body of available information: the common ground’ (Stalnaker 2014: 24, an idea that goes back to Stalnaker 1978) is nearly, but not quite, right. I define common ground as in Allan 2013b. The speaker/writer/signer makes presumptions about common ground which may properly be called presuppositions, but I argue that utterances carry pragmatic entailments rather than presuppositions, such that where A pragmatically entails B, B cannot – given A – be denied without creating a paradox, absurdity, or contradiction. I distinguish three aspects of context: C1, C2, and C3. C1 is the world (and time) spoken of, which is largely identified from co-text; to oversimplify, it captures what is said about what at some world (and time). C2 is the world (and time) spoken in, the situation of utterance; it captures who does the saying to whom, and where and when this takes place. C3 is the situation of interpretation, the circumstances under which the hearer/reader/viewer interprets what the speaker/writer/signer said, and these may be very different in space and time from C2, which may impact the interpretation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFurther Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy
Subtitle of host publicationPart 1 From Theory to Practice
EditorsAlessandro Capone, Marco Carapezza, Franco Lo Piparo
Place of PublicationCham Switzerland
PublisherSpringer
Pages177-201
Number of pages25
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9783319721736
ISBN (Print)9783319721729
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NamePerspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology
PublisherSpringer
Volume18
ISSN (Print)2214-3807
ISSN (Electronic)2214-3815

Keywords

  • Co-text
  • Common ground
  • Context
  • Pragmatic entailment
  • Presupposition

Cite this

Allan, K. (2018). Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning. In A. Capone, M. Carapezza, & F. Lo Piparo (Eds.), Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 1 From Theory to Practice (1st ed., pp. 177-201). (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology; Vol. 18). Cham Switzerland : Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_9
Allan, Keith. / Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning. Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 1 From Theory to Practice. editor / Alessandro Capone ; Marco Carapezza ; Franco Lo Piparo. 1st. ed. Cham Switzerland : Springer, 2018. pp. 177-201 (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology).
@inbook{537a53fa8ccc4c7487364d0b43f4282b,
title = "Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning",
abstract = "The significance of context to the proper interpretation of texts has been known for millennia; it is implicit in some of Aristotle’s recommendations in Rhetoric and Quintilian’s in Institutes that rhetoric should ideally be appropriate to what was, post Augustine, called its context. Malinowski wrote that a stick may be used for different purposes in different contexts, e.g. digging, punting, walking, fighting. Exactly the same is true of language expressions, e.g. a word which is an insult in one context may be an expression of camaraderie or endearment in another (and vice versa). Stalnaker’s claim ‘context [is] a body of available information: the common ground’ (Stalnaker 2014: 24, an idea that goes back to Stalnaker 1978) is nearly, but not quite, right. I define common ground as in Allan 2013b. The speaker/writer/signer makes presumptions about common ground which may properly be called presuppositions, but I argue that utterances carry pragmatic entailments rather than presuppositions, such that where A pragmatically entails B, B cannot{\^A} – given A – be denied without creating a paradox, absurdity, or contradiction. I distinguish three aspects of context: C1, C2, and C3. C1 is the world (and time) spoken of, which is largely identified from co-text; to oversimplify, it captures what is said about what at some world (and time). C2 is the world (and time) spoken in, the situation of utterance; it captures who does the saying to whom, and where and when this takes place. C3 is the situation of interpretation, the circumstances under which the hearer/reader/viewer interprets what the speaker/writer/signer said, and these may be very different in space and time from C2, which may impact the interpretation.",
keywords = "Co-text, Common ground, Context, Pragmatic entailment, Presupposition",
author = "Keith Allan",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319721729",
series = "Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "177--201",
editor = "Alessandro Capone and Marco Carapezza and {Lo Piparo}, Franco",
booktitle = "Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy",
edition = "1st",

}

Allan, K 2018, Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning. in A Capone, M Carapezza & F Lo Piparo (eds), Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 1 From Theory to Practice. 1st edn, Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol. 18, Springer, Cham Switzerland , pp. 177-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_9

Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning. / Allan, Keith.

Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 1 From Theory to Practice. ed. / Alessandro Capone; Marco Carapezza; Franco Lo Piparo. 1st. ed. Cham Switzerland : Springer, 2018. p. 177-201 (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology; Vol. 18).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning

AU - Allan, Keith

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The significance of context to the proper interpretation of texts has been known for millennia; it is implicit in some of Aristotle’s recommendations in Rhetoric and Quintilian’s in Institutes that rhetoric should ideally be appropriate to what was, post Augustine, called its context. Malinowski wrote that a stick may be used for different purposes in different contexts, e.g. digging, punting, walking, fighting. Exactly the same is true of language expressions, e.g. a word which is an insult in one context may be an expression of camaraderie or endearment in another (and vice versa). Stalnaker’s claim ‘context [is] a body of available information: the common ground’ (Stalnaker 2014: 24, an idea that goes back to Stalnaker 1978) is nearly, but not quite, right. I define common ground as in Allan 2013b. The speaker/writer/signer makes presumptions about common ground which may properly be called presuppositions, but I argue that utterances carry pragmatic entailments rather than presuppositions, such that where A pragmatically entails B, B cannot – given A – be denied without creating a paradox, absurdity, or contradiction. I distinguish three aspects of context: C1, C2, and C3. C1 is the world (and time) spoken of, which is largely identified from co-text; to oversimplify, it captures what is said about what at some world (and time). C2 is the world (and time) spoken in, the situation of utterance; it captures who does the saying to whom, and where and when this takes place. C3 is the situation of interpretation, the circumstances under which the hearer/reader/viewer interprets what the speaker/writer/signer said, and these may be very different in space and time from C2, which may impact the interpretation.

AB - The significance of context to the proper interpretation of texts has been known for millennia; it is implicit in some of Aristotle’s recommendations in Rhetoric and Quintilian’s in Institutes that rhetoric should ideally be appropriate to what was, post Augustine, called its context. Malinowski wrote that a stick may be used for different purposes in different contexts, e.g. digging, punting, walking, fighting. Exactly the same is true of language expressions, e.g. a word which is an insult in one context may be an expression of camaraderie or endearment in another (and vice versa). Stalnaker’s claim ‘context [is] a body of available information: the common ground’ (Stalnaker 2014: 24, an idea that goes back to Stalnaker 1978) is nearly, but not quite, right. I define common ground as in Allan 2013b. The speaker/writer/signer makes presumptions about common ground which may properly be called presuppositions, but I argue that utterances carry pragmatic entailments rather than presuppositions, such that where A pragmatically entails B, B cannot – given A – be denied without creating a paradox, absurdity, or contradiction. I distinguish three aspects of context: C1, C2, and C3. C1 is the world (and time) spoken of, which is largely identified from co-text; to oversimplify, it captures what is said about what at some world (and time). C2 is the world (and time) spoken in, the situation of utterance; it captures who does the saying to whom, and where and when this takes place. C3 is the situation of interpretation, the circumstances under which the hearer/reader/viewer interprets what the speaker/writer/signer said, and these may be very different in space and time from C2, which may impact the interpretation.

KW - Co-text

KW - Common ground

KW - Context

KW - Pragmatic entailment

KW - Presupposition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041062582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_9

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 9783319721729

T3 - Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology

SP - 177

EP - 201

BT - Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy

A2 - Capone, Alessandro

A2 - Carapezza, Marco

A2 - Lo Piparo, Franco

PB - Springer

CY - Cham Switzerland

ER -

Allan K. Getting a grip on context as a determinant of meaning. In Capone A, Carapezza M, Lo Piparo F, editors, Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 1 From Theory to Practice. 1st ed. Cham Switzerland : Springer. 2018. p. 177-201. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72173-6_9